Classical Sunni law caps what you can direct yourself at one-third of what is left after burial and debts. Ontario imposes no such cap — but it does impose its own payment order, its own taxes, and its own idea of what counts as your estate. The gap between the two is where the drafting happens.
Our charges include applicable taxes. Disbursements are extra and billed at cost — itemized upfront, in writing, never hidden.
From $563.87 taxes included
The limit traces to the report of Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas, who asked to give away two-thirds of his wealth, then half, and was told: one-third, and one-third is a lot. The Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hanbali schools all read that as a ceiling. Bequests are executed up to a third of the estate; anything beyond the third is not executed unless the heirs allow it after the death. The remaining two-thirds passes to the fixed heirs by entitlement, not by your direction.
All four schools also agree the third is not measured against everything you owned. Burial and funeral expenses come out, the deceased's debts come out, and the third is a third of what is left. The schools differ on the order between funeral costs and debts where the estate cannot cover both, and on how a debt secured against particular property is handled. Those differences bite only in an insolvent estate — which is when they matter most.
There is a further split over obligations owed to God rather than to people: unpaid zakat, an unperformed hajj, expiations. The Shafi'is and Hanbalis treat them as debts payable in full from the whole estate. The Hanafis hold that they lapse on death unless the deceased directed them by bequest, in which case they come out of the third. Which view your family follows changes the size of the third and of every share below it. That question is for your scholar; we draft to the answer you bring.
An Ontario estate trustee pays in sequence: funeral and testamentary expenses, then debts and taxes, then the legacies the will directs, then the residue. The Trustee Act lets the trustee advertise for creditors and then distribute without personal liability for claims they never had notice of. To that point the two systems line up almost exactly, and a client who assumes the classical order will simply be followed is, so far, right.
Tax is where they come apart. Death triggers a deemed disposition of capital property and a final income tax return, and Ontario charges estate administration tax on the value probated. Neither existed in the classical calculation. So a will saying one-third of my estate has to say whether that third is measured before or after income tax, administration tax and the costs of administering the estate. Leave it out and the trustee is guessing at a number that moves every share.
The Family Law Act adds a hold on top. Where a married spouse survives, nothing may be distributed in the six months after the death without that spouse's written consent or a court order, because that is the window for the equalization election. The one carve-out is that the hold does not prohibit reasonable advances to dependants of the deceased for their support, so a widow or a child left without income need not wait out the six months. A trustee who pays the bequests early and is then met with an election is personally exposed, up to the lesser of what was distributed and what the order requires. Build the delay into the plan rather than treating it as an obstruction.
The classical tarikah is everything the deceased owned. The Ontario estate is narrower. Property held in joint tenancy passes by survivorship the moment you die, and registered plans and insurance with a named beneficiary pass outside the will entirely. Someone whose house is jointly held with one child and whose RRSP names another can have most of their wealth land outside the pot the one-third is calculated on, leaving the will to govern a remainder that reflects nothing.
So define the pool in the document. A workable clause states what the one-third is computed against — estate assets only, or estate assets plus identified property passing outside the will — and directs how the bequests are funded if that pool turns out smaller than expected. Without it the fraction is arithmetically clear and practically meaningless, and the first argument after the funeral is about the denominator.
The Succession Law Reform Act does pull some outside property back in, but for one purpose only: satisfying a dependant's claim for support. Jointly held property, insurance proceeds and designated plan proceeds can be treated as estate assets to fund a support order. That clawback works for the dependant. It does not enlarge the pool your bequests are paid from, and it is no substitute for defining that pool yourself.
The majority Sunni position, on the report that there is no bequest for an heir, is that a bequest to a person who is an heir at the time of death is not executed unless the other heirs consent — and consent counts when given after the death, once their entitlement has vested. Consent given while the testator is alive is generally treated as retractable, though the Malikis are reported to bind consent given during a final illness. Note the timing: heirship is fixed at your death, not when the will is signed.
Ontario imposes none of this. You may leave anything to anyone, and a gift to your wife or son out of the third is enforced without asking the family. If you want the religious condition reflected in the instrument, it must be drafted as a contingent gift: the bequest takes effect only if named adult heirs consent in writing within a stated period after death, with a clear gift-over if they do not and a deadline the trustee can work to. Without both, the clause deadlocks the estate.
The alternative many families use is a completed gift during life. Classically a genuine lifetime gift, with possession actually taken, sits outside the one-third limit and outside the heir rule, while a gift made during a final illness is treated as a bequest and falls back under both. Ontario adds a wrinkle: a gratuitous transfer to an adult child is presumed held on trust for the estate unless the intention to gift is documented, and some transfers remain reachable in a dependant's claim.
Ontario law lets you leave the whole estate to charity and will enforce it. Classically the excess over the third is not executed unless the heirs ratify it after the death, and the four schools agree on that ceiling. One qualification is well known: the Hanafis hold that a person who dies with no heirs at all may bequeath everything, since no heir's right is reduced, while the Malikis and Shafi'is classically kept the limit on the footing that the public treasury takes the residue. Settle it with your scholar and tell us the answer.
Under Ontario law, yes, without restriction. Under the majority Sunni view a bequest to a person who is an heir at your death requires the other heirs' consent, given after you die. The two answers are not in conflict — Ontario enforces the gift, and the religious question sits separately. If you want the consent requirement built into the will rather than left to the family, it has to be a conditional gift with a named consent group, a deadline and a fallback beneficiary. A statement of intention does nothing.
Ontario has no view on it; the gift is simply enforced. Classically, the four Sunni schools permit a bequest to a non-Muslim within the one-third even though a non-Muslim does not take a fara'id share, which is why the wasiyya is the usual route for a convert who wants to provide for non-Muslim parents. Whether it fits your circumstances is a religious question for your scholar. The drafting itself is ordinary.
Then there is very little third to direct. Both systems pay debts before bequests, and an Ontario trustee who pays legacies ahead of creditors is personally liable for the shortfall. Where the estate cannot cover everything, the residue is exhausted first, then general legacies abate rateably among themselves, and specific gifts go last. If you want a different order — one bequest protected, or the whole third reduced proportionally — the will has to say so expressly.
Open your file tonight — a licensed Ontario lawyer will confirm everything with you by tomorrow.