If you and your spouse both die tomorrow, two questions get answered by strangers unless your will answers them first: who handles the money, and who raises the children. Ontario has specific rules on both, and neither works the way most people assume.
Our charges include applicable taxes. Disbursements are extra and billed at cost — itemized upfront, in writing, never hidden.
From $563.87 taxes included
Ontario calls the executor an estate trustee. You name the person in your will; their authority comes from the will, but to deal with banks, land and investments they usually have to prove it by obtaining a Certificate of Appointment of Estate Trustee from the Superior Court. The job is real work: secure the assets, pay reasonable funeral expenses and debts, file the deceased's final return and any estate return, obtain a clearance certificate from CRA, then distribute. Estate Administration Tax is payable under the Estate Administration Tax Act, 1998, and an Estate Information Return is due to the Ministry of Finance within 180 days of the certificate being issued.
The sequence Ontario imposes happens to track the classical Sunni sequence closely. Funeral expenses and debts are paid before any beneficiary receives anything; only what is left is distributed. In fiqh the order is funeral expenses, then debts, then the wasiyya of up to one third, then the fara'id shares. One debt that clients routinely forget: unpaid deferred mahr. On the classical position of all four schools it is a debt of the estate, not a gift, and it comes off the top. If you owe it, say so in the will and quantify it, because an executor cannot pay a debt nobody told them about.
Section 61 of the Trustee Act entitles a trustee to a fair and reasonable allowance for their care, pains and trouble, and Ontario practice has settled on a customary tariff. Whether the wasi may take payment is discussed differently across the schools, and that question belongs with your imam, not with us. What we can tell you is that if you want your executor to serve without compensation, the will has to say so, and if you want them paid a set amount rather than the tariff, the will has to say that too.
Residency matters more than people expect. Naming your brother in Karachi or your uncle in Cairo is emotionally natural, and only one of them is legally expensive. Section 6 of the Estates Act refuses letters probate to an executor resident outside Ontario AND outside the Commonwealth unless security is given. Pakistan is a Commonwealth country, so Karachi is not caught by it. Egypt is not, so your uncle in Cairo has to post a bond or bring a motion under section 37 (2) of the Estates Act to dispense with it — cost and delay before anything can be distributed. Worse, if the person controlling the estate is resident abroad, the estate can be treated as non-resident for Canadian income tax purposes, with consequences that dwarf the drafting fee. The usual answer is an Ontario-resident primary trustee, with a relative abroad involved informally or as a second signature.
Name alternates. The single most common failure we see is a will naming only a spouse, with nothing behind it — which is exactly the scenario these pages are about. Name a first choice, a second, and ideally a third. If you appoint two people together, add a clause dealing with deadlock, because the default rules for co-trustees generally push toward unanimity and two siblings who disagree can stall an estate for a year.
If you want the estate held in a particular way while it is being administered — free of interest-bearing instruments, or in screened investments — put it in the will expressly. Section 27 of the Trustee Act imposes a prudent-investor standard on trustees, and a trustee who departs from it on their own initiative, however sincerely, is personally exposed. A clear authorisation in the will, coupled with relief from liability for following it, is what protects them. The same applies if you want a property held rather than sold promptly.
Section 61 of the Children's Law Reform Act lets a parent who has decision-making responsibility for a child appoint someone, by will, to take that responsibility after the parent's death. Two limits matter. First, it does not override a surviving parent — if one of you lives, the appointment does not displace them. Second, and this surprises almost everyone: the appointment is temporary. It runs for 90 days, and unless the person you named applies to court within that window for a permanent order, it expires. So the appointment is a starting gun, not a finish line, and the person you name has to be willing to walk into a courtroom.
The court is not bound by your choice. It applies the best interests of the child test, and the enumerated factors include the child's cultural, linguistic, religious and spiritual upbringing and heritage. That cuts in your favour: a written appointment, plus a short signed statement of why you chose that person and how you want the children raised, is relevant evidence rather than sentiment. In practice an unopposed appointment of a capable relative is usually confirmed. A contested one — the Muslim aunt in Mississauga against the non-Muslim grandparents in Kingston — is decided on the child's interests, not on your instructions.
Classical Sunni law has its own ordering of who holds wilaya over a minor and their property, and the schools differ on it: the Hanafi arrangement runs father, then the father's appointed wasi, then the paternal grandfather, then his appointee, while the other schools order it differently, and hadana over a young child is treated as a separate question from guardianship of property. An Ontario court will apply none of that. Whatever your school holds, the practical consequence is the same — the person must be named in your will and must be prepared to apply.
A minor cannot hold an inheritance in Ontario. If your will leaves a child's fara'id share to them outright with no trust, the money generally cannot be handed to whoever is raising them beyond the limit set for section 51 of the Children's Law Reform Act — currently $35,000, a figure fixed by O. Reg. 120/21 rather than by the Act itself, so it can move without the statute changing; the balance is paid into court, to the Accountant of the Superior Court, and released to the child in full on their eighteenth birthday. A seventeen-year-old with a court-held share and a bank card is not what anyone intended.
The fix is a trust inside the will. The trustee holds each child's share, spends what is needed for maintenance, housing and education, and pays out capital at ages you choose. There is a genuine point of contact here: the schools require a minor's property to be withheld until maturity and sound judgment — rushd — rather than released on a fixed birthday, and Abu Hanifa is reported to have set an outer limit of twenty-five even where sound judgment was not established, while the majority tie release to rushd itself. Ontario needs a number. Most clients choose staged payments at 21 and 25.
Separate the two jobs. The person best placed to raise your children is often not the person you would trust with an investment account, and making one person both creates a conflict every time the guardian asks the trustee for money. Name the guardian, name a different trustee, and add an allowance clause so the guardian can draw on the fund for housing, food and school without going cap in hand or to court.
If you are legally married under Ontario law, section 6 of the Family Law Act lets your surviving spouse elect to take an equalization of net family property instead of taking under your will, with a six-month deadline running from death and a filing with the Estate Registrar. On a long marriage with a home in your name, a one-eighth share can be a fraction of what equalization would pay. Where the spouse elects, the gifts to them in the will are generally revoked unless the will expressly says the gift is in addition. That election, not your will, then drives the outcome.
Part V of the Succession Law Reform Act is the second pressure point. A dependant — a spouse including a common-law spouse for this purpose, a child, a parent, in defined circumstances a sibling — who was being supported can apply for support out of the estate whatever the will says, and section 72 pulls assets that passed outside the estate, such as joint accounts and beneficiary designations, back into the pot for that purpose. Choosing your executor and guardian carefully does not answer these claims. It means a competent person is holding the file when one arrives.
No. The appointment under section 61 of the Children's Law Reform Act takes effect on your death if no other parent survives, but only for 90 days, and the person you named has to apply to court within that period for a permanent order. The court then decides on the best interests of the child. Your appointment carries real weight — it is written evidence of your judgment, and the best-interests factors expressly include the child's cultural, linguistic, religious and spiritual upbringing and heritage — but it is a strong recommendation, not a transfer of a right.
You can, and we would usually advise against it as the primary appointment. The bond point is narrower than it is usually stated. Section 6 of the Estates Act requires security only where the estate trustee is resident outside Ontario and outside the Commonwealth. Pakistan is a Commonwealth member, so a brother in Karachi does not trigger it. A brother in Cairo, Dubai or Chicago does, and he would have to post a bond or move under section 37 (2) to dispense with it, which adds cost and delay before anything can be distributed. Separately, an estate managed from abroad risks being treated as non-resident for Canadian income tax, which is a much larger problem than the bond. A workable compromise is an Ontario-resident trustee who is directed to consult a named relative overseas, or a co-appointment where one of the two is here.
You can state it, and you should. It is not binding on the court or on the guardian — no testamentary direction about upbringing is. But the best-interests test the court applies expressly takes account of a child's religious and spiritual upbringing and heritage, so a clear written statement from you is admissible, relevant and in practice persuasive, particularly where the competing options differ on that point. Put the appointment in the will and the detail — mosque, language, schooling, halal household, which city — in a signed letter of wishes kept with it.
No, not without destroying the bequest. Section 12 of the Succession Law Reform Act voids a gift to a person who witnesses the will, or to that witness's spouse, even though the will itself remains valid. The court has a discretion to save the gift in some circumstances, but relying on it is a bad plan. Use two witnesses who take nothing under the will and are not married to anyone who does — not your children, not your spouse, not a beneficiary of your one-third.
Someone has to apply to the Superior Court to be appointed to administer the estate under your will, and the Estates Act sets out who has priority to apply. In a family that agrees, that is an inconvenience and a delay. In a family that does not, it is a contested application decided by a judge who has never met you, while the estate sits frozen. A bond is more likely to be required. Naming an executor and two alternates takes one line and removes the whole problem. Treadstone drafts a will for a flat $563.87, taxes included.
Open your file tonight — a licensed Ontario lawyer will confirm everything with you by tomorrow.