- Most Ontario LOIs are structured so the price, deal structure, and closing timeline are non-binding expressions of intent, while a specific, shorter list of clauses — commonly…
- Simply declining to proceed to a definitive agreement If the LOI's commercial terms are non-binding and neither side has violated a binding clause, declining to move forward is generally…
- What either side can actually recover if the other walks away depends heavily on: - Which specific clause, if any, was breached — a breach of an exclusivity clause is analyzed…
Due diligence turns up something unexpected, financing falls through, or one side simply gets cold feet — and now someone wants to walk away from a signed letter of intent. Before assuming that's either completely free of consequences or a full-blown breach of contract, it helps to understand what an LOI actually protects, and where the real exposure sits.
The short version: walking away from the commercial terms of a typical Ontario business-sale LOI is usually not, by itself, a breach of contract — but walking away in a way that violates one of the LOI's binding provisions can be.
The General Rule
Most Ontario LOIs are structured so the price, deal structure, and closing timeline are non-binding expressions of intent, while a specific, shorter list of clauses — commonly confidentiality, exclusivity, governing law, and cost allocation — are drafted to bind the parties regardless of whether the deal ever closes.
That structure exists precisely so either side can walk away from the deal itself (because due diligence didn't check out, financing didn't come together, or the numbers no longer make sense) without that alone being treated as a breach. What can still expose you is breaching one of the carved-out binding provisions on your way out the door.
Three Common Ways People "Break" an LOI
1. Simply declining to proceed to a definitive agreement
If the LOI's commercial terms are non-binding and neither side has violated a binding clause, declining to move forward is generally within the deal's own terms — frustrating, but not itself a legal wrong. This is the most common and lowest-risk way an LOI ends without a closing.
2. Walking away while breaching a binding clause
A seller who signs an exclusivity clause and then negotiates with, or sells to, a different buyer during the exclusivity period has walked away from the deal and likely breached a binding obligation. Here, the exposure isn't for failing to close — it's for breaching the specific clause that was meant to survive regardless.
3. Walking away after conduct that goes beyond "just not proceeding"
Depending on the facts — for example, misrepresenting information during the negotiation, or inducing the other side to incur costs or forgo other opportunities based on statements outside the four corners of the LOI — a party's conduct can create exposure separate from the LOI's binding/non-binding structure altogether. This is fact-specific territory and not something a general article can resolve; it needs a lawyer looking at what was actually said and done.
What a Buyer or Seller Can Typically Recover
What either side can actually recover if the other walks away depends heavily on:
- Which specific clause, if any, was breached — a breach of an exclusivity clause is analyzed differently than a breach of confidentiality, which is different again from conduct outside the LOI's binding terms.
- What the LOI itself says about remedies. Some LOIs specify consequences for breaching particular clauses; many leave it to general contract-law principles.
- What loss can actually be shown. A party generally has to demonstrate it suffered a loss connected to the breach — the mere fact that a deal didn't close is not, by itself, evidence of a compensable loss.
There is no default dollar outcome or formula here — this is decided case by case based on the specific facts and the specific document.
Reducing Your Risk Before You Sign
- [ ] Confirm, in writing, exactly which clauses of the LOI are binding and which are not.
- [ ] Don't rely on verbal assurances outside the document — put anything material into the LOI itself.
- [ ] If exclusivity is included, understand its full scope before agreeing, since a breach here is one of the more common sources of real exposure.
- [ ] Keep records of what due diligence findings or financing issues actually drove a decision to walk away — this matters if the other side disputes your reasons later.
- [ ] Get legal advice before sending a formal notice that you're walking away, especially if the other side is disputing your right to do so.
Frequently asked questions
Can I just walk away from a business sale LOI if I change my mind about the price?
Usually, yes, if the price term is drafted as non-binding (as it typically is) and you haven't breached any binding clause on your way out. Review your specific LOI's language before assuming this, since drafting varies.
Does the other side owe me anything for wasted due diligence costs if they walk away?
Not automatically. Unless the LOI specifically allocates costs, or the other party's conduct crossed into a breach of a binding clause or something beyond simply declining to proceed, each side generally bears its own advisor and due diligence costs regardless of outcome. Some LOIs address cost allocation explicitly — check yours.
What if the seller signed my LOI and then sold to someone else?
If the LOI included an exclusivity clause covering that period, this is a strong candidate for a breach claim, and you should get legal advice promptly. If there was no exclusivity clause at all, the seller was likely free to negotiate elsewhere, however frustrating that is.
Is it better to just not sign an LOI at all to avoid this risk?
Not necessarily. An LOI, done properly, actually protects both sides during negotiations — the risk isn't the LOI itself, it's signing one without understanding which parts bind you. A lawyer can help you negotiate an LOI that protects your position without locking you into the deal prematurely.
This is a business purchase or sale question
Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.