TREADSTONE LAW · ONTARIO · DIGITAL LEGAL SERVICES · EST. MMXXI ·TSL
Home/Articles/Family Law
№ 482 Family Law

Voice of the Child Report vs. Custody Assessment in Ontario

The difference between a Voice of the Child Report and a full custody and access assessment in Ontario family court, and when each one is used.

Family Law5 min readTSLBy the Treadstone Law team · OntarioUpdated 2026-07
All articles
Key takeaways
  • - One or more meetings between the child and a trained interviewer - A focus on eliciting the child's own perspective, in an age-appropriate way, without either parent present - A report…
  • A full assessment — often called a Section 30 assessment, after the provision of Ontario's Children's Law Reform Act that authorizes it — goes considerably further: - Separate interviews…

When parents disagree about parenting arrangements, Ontario family courts have more than one way to learn what the child themselves thinks and needs. Two of the most common tools — a Voice of the Child Report and a full custody and access assessment — get confused often, but they serve different purposes, involve different professionals, and fit different kinds of cases.

This guide lays out the difference so you know what to expect, and what to ask about, in your own case.

The Core Difference at a Glance

Voice of the Child ReportCustody and Access Assessment
Main purposeRelays the child's own views and preferences to the courtEvaluates parenting capacity and recommends an overall arrangement
Who conducts itOften a clinician connected with the Office of the Children's Lawyer, or another qualified professionalA psychologist, social worker, or other qualified assessor
ScopeNarrower — focused on what the child says, in the child's own words as much as possibleBroader — includes interviews, observation, and analysis of both parents
Does it make a recommendation?Generally reports the child's views without weighing in on the outcomeTypically includes specific recommendations about parenting arrangements
When it's usedCases where the court wants the child's perspective without a full assessmentHigher-conflict cases needing a full evaluation of parenting capacity

What a Voice of the Child Report Involves

What a Custody and Access Assessment Involves

A full assessment — often called a Section 30 assessment, after the provision of Ontario's Children's Law Reform Act that authorizes it — goes considerably further:

Which One Might a Judge Use in Your Case

Which option — if any — makes sense for your situation depends heavily on the child's age, the nature of the conflict, and what specific information the court actually needs. This is a question to work through with your family lawyer rather than assume from the outset.

What Happens to the Report Afterward

Once either type of report is filed, it generally becomes part of the court record and is shared with both parents' lawyers, and often the parents themselves, subject to any specific restrictions a judge imposes. It can be used in negotiations, help settle the case without a trial, or be entered as evidence if the matter proceeds to a hearing. Because these reports can shape how a case unfolds, it's worth talking to your lawyer in advance about how the results might be used, and what your options are if you disagree with what a report says.

Frequently asked questions

Does a young child have to participate in either process?

Very young children are less likely to be directly interviewed in either process; how a child's age affects what's appropriate is generally left to the professional conducting the report or assessment, in consultation with the court.

Can both a Voice of the Child Report and a full assessment happen in the same case?

It's possible, though not typical — courts generally try to use the tool that fits the specific gap in the evidence, rather than ordering both as a default. Ask your lawyer whether your case might call for more than one.

Who pays for these reports?

Cost arrangements vary by report type and are often addressed specifically in the order authorizing it, or negotiated between the parties. Speak with your lawyer about what's typical in your court.

Is a child's stated preference binding on the judge?

No. A child's expressed views are one factor a judge considers under the best-interests test, weighed against the child's age and maturity and everything else in the case — not a binding instruction the court must follow.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Ontario laws, tax rates, and government programs change, and how the law applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a licensed Ontario lawyer. Treadstone Law is licensed by the Law Society of Ontario — reach us at 1-844-900-1070 or start a file online.

This is a family law question

Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.

ContactStart a File →