- A reconsideration request is not a formal legal remedy created by the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
- - [ ] A clear factual or clerical error is visible on the face of the refusal letter - [ ] Key evidence was submitted but appears not to have been considered at all - [ ] Your…
When IRCC refuses an application, many people’s first instinct is to write back and ask the officer to look again, rather than filing a formal appeal or heading to court. This informal option is often called a reconsideration request. It is flexible, inexpensive, and appeals to anyone hoping for a quick fix — but it works far less often than people expect, and misunderstanding it can cost you a real remedy.
This article explains what a reconsideration request actually is, when it realistically leads anywhere, and the one mistake that catches the most applicants off guard.
What Is a Reconsideration Request?
A reconsideration request is not a formal legal remedy created by the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. It is an informal ask, sent directly to IRCC or the relevant office, for an officer to look again at a decision — usually because you believe something was misunderstood, overlooked, or has since changed.
Because it is not a statutory process, there is no fixed form, no guaranteed response time, and no obligation on IRCC’s part to reconsider anything at all.
Reconsideration vs. Appeal vs. Judicial Review
| Reconsideration Request | Formal Appeal (IAD) | Judicial Review (Federal Court) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal basis | Informal, discretionary | Statutory right, only for eligible decisions (e.g., sponsorship refusals) | Statutory, requires leave (permission) from the Court |
| Who decides | The same office or program area | The Immigration Appeal Division | A Federal Court judge |
| Reviews the merits? | Sometimes, informally | Yes — generally a fresh look | No — legality and fairness of process only |
| Deadline | No fixed deadline, but does not pause other clocks | Short, strict deadline from the written reasons | Strict deadline from notice of decision |
When Officers Are Realistically Willing to Revisit a Decision
- [ ] A clear factual or clerical error is visible on the face of the refusal letter
- [ ] Key evidence was submitted but appears not to have been considered at all
- [ ] Your circumstances materially changed after the decision was issued
- [ ] New, genuinely relevant information has become available that was not available before
When a Reconsideration Request Is a Waste of Time
- You disagree with the officer’s exercise of judgment, but nothing was actually missed or wrong.
- You are hoping a different officer will simply reach a different conclusion on the same facts.
- You have no genuinely new information beyond restating your original submissions.
- You have already let the appeal or judicial review deadline pass and are hoping reconsideration is a backdoor. It is not.
How to Write an Effective Reconsideration Request
If you decide a reconsideration request is worth trying, keep it tightly focused:
- State clearly what you believe was missed, misunderstood, or has changed — do not simply repeat your original application.
- Attach only what is genuinely new or directly supports the specific point you are raising.
- Keep your tone factual rather than argumentative; you are asking an officer to take another look, not litigating the decision.
- Note in your covering letter that you are pursuing, or reserving the right to pursue, a formal appeal or judicial review in parallel, so there is no ambiguity about your intentions.
None of this guarantees a response, let alone a favourable one, but a focused, well-supported request is far more likely to get a genuine second look than a lengthy re-statement of your original case.
The Biggest Risk: Deadlines Do Not Pause
This is the trap that catches the most applicants. Asking IRCC to reconsider does not stop the clock on your right to appeal or seek judicial review. Where a formal appeal route or judicial review is available, that deadline — for judicial review, commonly 15 days if the decision was made inside Canada or 60 days if made outside Canada, though always verify the current figure — keeps running regardless of whether a reconsideration request is pending.
If you wait for a reconsideration response before deciding whether to appeal, you can lose your formal remedy entirely, with no reconsideration decision to show for it.
Frequently asked questions
Does a reconsideration request pause my appeal deadline?
No. Formal appeal and judicial review deadlines keep running whether or not IRCC is considering your reconsideration request. Many applicants lose their appeal rights this way.
How long does IRCC take to respond to a reconsideration request?
There is no fixed or guaranteed response time, since it is not a formal legal process. Do not rely on getting an answer before a deadline arrives.
Can I submit a reconsideration request and also start a formal appeal or judicial review at the same time?
Generally yes, and it is often the safer approach — pursuing your formal remedy protects your rights while the reconsideration request is still pending.
What should I actually include in a reconsideration request?
Focus on what is genuinely new or was demonstrably missed — a clerical error, overlooked evidence, or a material change in circumstances — rather than simply repeating your original submissions.
Is a reconsideration request the same thing as "reopening" my file?
Not exactly. A reconsideration request simply asks an officer to look again at an existing decision. "Reopening" is sometimes used loosely in the same sense, but neither term describes a formal, guaranteed process the way an appeal or judicial review does.
This is an immigration question
Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.