- Ontario's Trustee Act sets out an investment standard requiring a trustee to exercise the care, skill, diligence, and judgment that a prudent investor would apply when managing their own…
- - The overall portfolio, not each asset in isolation.
- - Leaving a substantial sum sitting in a non-interest-bearing account for an extended period without good reason - Putting estate funds into a single speculative or high-risk investment…
Sitting on estate funds isn't a passive job. Whether an estate trustee is holding cash for a few months while an estate is settled, or managing a testamentary trust for years, Ontario's prudent investor rule sets a real legal standard for how that money must be handled. Leaving a large sum earning nothing in a low-interest account can be just as much a problem as putting it into something reckless.
Understanding what "prudent" actually means — and what it does not — helps trustees avoid a mistake that is easy to make with the best of intentions.
What the Prudent Investor Standard Means
Ontario's Trustee Act sets out an investment standard requiring a trustee to exercise the care, skill, diligence, and judgment that a prudent investor would apply when managing their own property. This is a standard of conduct, not a guarantee of results — a trustee who invests carefully and reasonably is not automatically at fault simply because an investment later performs poorly.
What Factors a Prudent Trustee Considers
- The overall portfolio, not each asset in isolation. A prudent investor evaluates how investments work together, not whether any single holding was, in hindsight, the best possible choice.
- Diversification. Concentrating estate funds in one asset or one type of investment generally increases risk without a corresponding benefit.
- The estate's actual needs. A short estate administration holding funds temporarily has very different needs than a testamentary trust meant to provide income for years.
- Time horizon. Money needed for near-term distribution should generally be managed more conservatively than funds held in a long-running trust.
- Beneficiaries' circumstances. A trust for a minor beneficiary, or one intended to support someone for decades, calls for a different approach than a short-term holding period.
- Costs of investing. Fees and transaction costs are a legitimate part of a prudent decision, not an afterthought.
Common Missteps That Can Breach the Standard
- Leaving a substantial sum sitting in a non-interest-bearing account for an extended period without good reason
- Putting estate funds into a single speculative or high-risk investment
- Failing to diversify across different types of assets where the estate's size and timeline would reasonably call for it
- Making investment choices based on the trustee's own financial goals or preferences rather than the estate's or trust's needs
- Ignoring professional advice without a sound reason for doing so
Getting Professional Investment Advice
Trustees are generally permitted to rely on qualified professional investment advice, and doing so can help demonstrate that the required standard of care was met. This does not mean a trustee can blindly hand off all responsibility — they still need to exercise reasonable oversight and judgment — but seeking and following sound professional advice is consistent with, not a substitute for, prudent conduct.
Revisiting the Strategy Over Time
Prudent investing is not a single decision made at the outset and then left alone. An estate's or trust's circumstances change — a trust that seemed likely to be short-term can end up running much longer than expected, or a beneficiary's needs can shift over time. Periodically revisiting the investment strategy, rather than treating the first decision as permanent, is itself part of what a prudent investor in the trustee's position would do.
Short-Term Estate Administration vs. Long-Term Trusts
The standard applies differently depending on context. A straightforward estate being wound up over a matter of months, mostly holding cash while assets are gathered and debts paid, has less need for an elaborate investment strategy than a testamentary trust — for example, a spousal trust or a trust for a minor or disabled beneficiary — that may operate for years. The longer the money will be held, the more the prudent investor standard expects a deliberate, ongoing investment strategy rather than a one-time decision.
Frequently asked questions
Does the prudent investor rule mean a trustee can never take any investment risk?
No. It means risk has to be reasonable and appropriate to the estate's or trust's circumstances, considered as part of an overall strategy — not that a trustee must avoid every form of market risk entirely.
Can an estate trustee just leave money in a regular bank account the whole time?
For a short administration period, holding funds in a simple, low-risk account while assets are gathered and debts are settled is often reasonable. Leaving a large sum sitting idle for an extended period, without considering more appropriate options, can be harder to justify as prudent.
Does the standard apply the same way to a quick estate administration and a decades-long trust?
The underlying legal standard is the same, but what it requires in practice differs significantly based on how long the funds will be held and what the beneficiaries need — a short administration and a multi-year trust call for different strategies.
Can a trustee be held personally liable for investment losses?
Potentially, if the losses resulted from a failure to meet the prudent investor standard — for example, an undiversified or reckless investment decision. A trustee who exercised reasonable care and judgment is generally not liable simply because an investment underperformed.
This is a wills & estates question
Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.