- An estate trustee is a fiduciary, which means they must act in the best interests of the estate and all its beneficiaries — not just the ones they like, trust, or feel closest to.
- The executor is also a beneficiary It is common — and legally permitted — for an executor to also be a beneficiary.
- - [ ] Send the same updates, at the same time, to every beneficiary — not just the ones who ask - [ ] Apply the same standard when deciding what counts as a reasonable estate expense,…
Being named executor of a family member's estate rarely comes with a clean slate. Executors are often closer to some beneficiaries than others — a sibling they talk to every week, a niece they barely know, an estranged parent. Ontario law does not care about any of that. An executor's duty of impartial treatment of beneficiaries applies regardless of how the executor personally feels about the people involved.
This can be one of the hardest parts of the role, precisely because it asks someone to set aside personal relationships and family history in favour of a strict, evenhanded standard.
What the Duty of Impartiality Actually Requires
An estate trustee is a fiduciary, which means they must act in the best interests of the estate and all its beneficiaries — not just the ones they like, trust, or feel closest to. Impartiality does not mean every beneficiary receives identical treatment regardless of the will; it means the executor applies the will's terms, and their own judgment as trustee, the same way to everyone, without letting personal feelings tip the scale.
Where Bias Tends to Creep In
The executor is also a beneficiary
It is common — and legally permitted — for an executor to also be a beneficiary. The risk is that decisions about timing, expenses, or asset valuation start to (even unconsciously) favour the executor's own share over other beneficiaries' shares.
One beneficiary is more vocal than the others
An executor fielding constant calls from one anxious or demanding beneficiary can end up prioritizing that person's requests — faster updates, quicker distributions — over quieter beneficiaries who are equally entitled to the same attention.
Old family dynamics resurface
Long-standing sibling rivalries, a favoured child, or resentment toward an estranged relative can all quietly shape how an executor exercises discretion, even when the executor believes they are being fair.
Blended families add complexity
Where a will divides an estate between a current spouse and children from an earlier relationship, an executor connected more closely to one side of the family needs to be especially deliberate about even treatment.
What Impartial Administration Looks Like in Practice
- [ ] Send the same updates, at the same time, to every beneficiary — not just the ones who ask
- [ ] Apply the same standard when deciding what counts as a reasonable estate expense, regardless of who benefits
- [ ] Rely on professional valuations rather than personal opinion when an asset's worth affects how shares are divided
- [ ] Treat requests to speed up or delay a distribution the same way no matter which beneficiary is asking
- [ ] Document the reasoning behind discretionary decisions so they can be explained later if questioned
When Partiality Becomes a Legal Problem
Occasional missteps born from stress or inexperience are different from a pattern of favouritism that actually disadvantages a beneficiary. If an executor's bias results in unequal information, delayed or reduced distributions, or decisions that clearly serve one beneficiary's interest over another's, beneficiaries can raise the issue directly, through a passing of accounts, or by asking the court to intervene — which can include removing the estate trustee in serious cases.
Being a Beneficiary Yourself Doesn't Disqualify You
Ontario law does not require an executor to give up their own inheritance or step aside simply because they are also named as a beneficiary. What it requires is extra discipline: separating "what is fair for the estate" from "what benefits me," and being able to show, if asked, that every beneficiary was treated the same way.
How This Duty Interacts With Other Executor Obligations
Impartiality does not stand alone — it works alongside an executor's separate duties to communicate honestly with beneficiaries and to keep proper accounts. An executor who behaves impartially but keeps everyone in the dark is still falling short, because unequal information often looks and feels like favouritism even when none was intended.
A few habits help executors stay on the right side of both duties at once:
- Send the same summary update to every beneficiary at the same time, rather than answering individual questions ad hoc
- Keep a simple written log of major decisions and why they were made
- When in doubt about whether something needs to be shared, share it
None of this requires polished communication skills — it requires consistency, which beneficiaries can usually recognize even when they disagree with a particular decision.
Frequently asked questions
Can an executor also be a beneficiary of the estate?
Yes. It is common for an executor to also inherit under the will. The role still requires them to act impartially toward every other beneficiary, without letting their own interest in the estate influence administrative decisions.
What should I do if I think an executor is favouring another beneficiary?
Start by raising the concern directly and asking for the information or explanation you believe you're owed. If the pattern continues, a passing of accounts or a court application can bring the executor's conduct under formal review.
Does impartiality mean treating every beneficiary identically?
No. It means applying the will's terms and reasonable discretion consistently, not favouring one person's interests over another's. A will can validly leave beneficiaries unequal shares — impartiality is about how the executor administers the estate, not about equalizing outcomes the will didn't intend.
Can beneficiaries have an executor removed for favouritism?
In serious cases, yes. Courts can remove an estate trustee whose conduct breaches their fiduciary duty, including sustained favouritism that harms a beneficiary's interests. This is generally treated as a significant step, not a response to minor disagreements.
This is a wills & estates question
Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.