- Sort the problem into one of these buckets first: - A false statement in the agreement.
- Pull out the purchase agreement and disclosure schedule and read them again, specifically for the issue you've found: - Was this specifically disclosed anywhere, even in a schedule you…
- Whether the seller's original corporation is even a viable target matters: - In a share sale, the corporation you bought carries its full history — the same legal entity you now own is…
You closed the deal, took over the keys, and started running the business — and then something surfaces that nobody mentioned during due diligence. A customer contract that doesn't say what you thought. A piece of equipment under a lien. A tax filing that was never made. A key employee who was quietly planning to leave.
The instinct is often to feel like the deal itself was unfair. Legally, though, the question is narrower and more useful: what does the purchase agreement actually say happens now? Here's how to work through it.
Step 1: Figure Out What Kind of Problem This Actually Is
Not every unwelcome surprise is a legal claim. Sort the problem into one of these buckets first:
- A false statement in the agreement. The seller represented something specific — financial figures, contract status, compliance, ownership of an asset — and it wasn't true. This is a potential breach of representation or warranty.
- A liability that wasn't clearly allocated. Especially in an asset deal, the agreement should say which liabilities the buyer assumed and which stayed with the seller. If the problem falls into the "not assumed" category, it may still be the seller's responsibility.
- Ordinary business risk. Sometimes a customer leaves, a piece of equipment breaks down, or the market shifts. If nothing in the agreement was actually false and no liability was mis-allocated, this is often just the risk that comes with owning a business — not a legal claim against the seller.
Getting this categorization right early saves a lot of wasted effort chasing a claim that doesn't exist, or missing one that does.
Step 2: Check What the Agreement Actually Promised
Pull out the purchase agreement and disclosure schedule and read them again, specifically for the issue you've found:
- Was this specifically disclosed anywhere, even in a schedule you didn't focus on at the time?
- Does a representation or warranty cover this area at all?
- Is there a materiality qualifier or knowledge qualifier that limits what the seller was actually promising?
- What's the survival period for that particular representation — is it still open, or has the window already closed?
- Is there a basket (minimum claim threshold) or a cap on total indemnity exposure that affects whether this is even worth pursuing?
Step 3: Consider How the Deal Was Structured
Whether the seller's original corporation is even a viable target matters:
- In a share sale, the corporation you bought carries its full history — the same legal entity you now own is the one that may have created or inherited the problem, which can complicate who's really "on the other side" of a claim.
- In an asset sale, the seller's corporation is usually still a separate, identifiable party, which can make pursuing a claim more straightforward — provided that entity still exists and has assets or insurance to respond with.
Step 4: Preserve the Evidence and Give Notice
Purchase agreements typically require the buyer to give the seller formal written notice of a claim within specific timeframes, often with reasonable detail about the nature and amount of the loss. Missing this step — even with a legitimate claim — can jeopardize your ability to recover. Document what you found, when you found it, and what it's costing you, before memories fade or records go stale.
Step 5: Decide How to Pursue It
Depending on what the agreement allows and what's actually at stake, options generally include:
- Direct negotiation with the seller, especially if the relationship is otherwise good and the amount is modest.
- A formal indemnity claim, drawing on any holdback or escrow set up specifically for this purpose.
- The agreement's built-in dispute mechanism, such as referral to an independent accountant for a financial disagreement, or arbitration for a broader one.
- Litigation, where the agreement doesn't provide an adequate remedy or the other side won't engage.
Frequently asked questions
Can I get out of the deal entirely if I find something serious enough?
Unwinding a closed transaction (rescission) is generally difficult once a deal has closed, and it's not the default remedy under most purchase agreements. Most agreements are built around compensating the buyer financially — through an indemnity claim — rather than reversing the transaction. Whether anything more is available depends heavily on the specific facts.
What if the problem isn't covered by any representation in the agreement?
Then you may not have a contractual claim against the seller for it, however unfair that feels. This is exactly why thorough due diligence and carefully drafted representations matter so much before you sign — gaps in coverage are much harder to fix after closing than before it.
Does it matter if I "should have" found the problem during due diligence?
It can. Many purchase agreements limit or exclude claims for matters the buyer actually knew about before closing, and some go further with broader "buyer's knowledge" provisions. Whether a missed issue falls into that category is a fact-specific question worth reviewing with a lawyer rather than assuming either way.
How quickly do I need to act once I find a problem?
Promptly. Notice deadlines in purchase agreements are often strict, and delay can also make it harder to prove when you actually discovered the issue and what it has cost you. Treat the discovery of a real problem as something to raise with a lawyer right away, not something to sit on.
This is a business purchase or sale question
Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.