A wrongful dismissal claim is not about whether you deserved to be fired. It is about whether you were given enough notice, or enough pay in place of it. The Employment Standards Act sets the floor. The common law is frequently several times higher, and the gap is what the claim is worth.
Our charges include applicable taxes. Disbursements are extra and billed at cost — itemized upfront, in writing, never hidden.
From $450.87 taxes included
The Employment Standards Act, 2000 sets a minimum notice period that scales with length of service and caps at eight weeks. Statutory severance pay is a separate entitlement: it applies where you have five or more years of service and your employer has an Ontario payroll of at least $2.5 million, or severed 50 or more employees within six months because of a permanent closure. It is one week per year of service, capped at 26 weeks.
Common law reasonable notice is usually more, sometimes far more. There is no formula. The courts weigh the character of the employment, length of service, age, and the availability of similar work given the person's experience, training and qualifications.
Whether you get the common law amount depends on your contract. A termination clause that is clearly drafted and meets the statutory minimums can limit you to those minimums. Many clauses fail — commonly because their "just cause" or "for cause" wording allows the employer to withhold statutory entitlements in circumstances the Act does not permit. When the clause fails, it is unenforceable and the common law entitlement revives.
Damages over the notice period are not just base salary. Benefits, pension contributions, a car allowance, commissions and bonuses you would have earned are generally included, subject to what the bonus plan says.
You do not have to be told you are fired. If the employer unilaterally changes a fundamental term — cuts pay, demotes you, moves your workplace a long way, strips your responsibilities — or makes the environment intolerable, you may be able to treat it as a dismissal and sue for notice.
It is a genuinely risky route. If a court decides the change was not fundamental, you resigned, and you get nothing. Get advice before you walk out.
Timing matters both ways. Object promptly and in writing; carry on working under the new terms without complaint for too long and you may be taken to have accepted them. A temporary layoff imposed without a contractual or statutory right to do so can itself amount to constructive dismissal.
You are required to look for comparable work. Not any work, and not immediately at a lower level, but a reasonable search for a similar role. Keep a written record of applications, recruiters contacted and interviews — it is routinely demanded in the litigation.
Earnings from a new job during the notice period are generally deducted from what the old employer owes, which is why a fast re-hire reduces the claim. Refusing a reasonable offer of continued employment from the same employer can cut it too.
Employment Insurance interacts with all of this. Where a settlement is allocated to a notice period, benefits already paid usually have to be repaid out of it, and the employer reports the allocation. Where the employer's conduct in the manner of dismissal was in bad faith and caused real mental distress, moral damages can be added; punitive damages exist but require independent, egregious wrongdoing and are rare.
A complaint to the Ministry of Labour costs nothing but delivers only the statutory minimums, and it forecloses your options: filing a complaint about termination or severance pay generally bars a civil action for the same entitlement. There is a short window to withdraw a complaint if you change your mind. Making that choice without advice is the most expensive mistake in this area.
In court, Small Claims Court now handles claims up to $50,000, which covers a good number of shorter-service dismissals and costs far less to run. Above that you are in the Superior Court, with the Simplified Procedure applying to most claims up to $200,000.
The limitation period for a civil claim is two years from the dismissal. An Employment Standards Act complaint has its own, separate deadline. And where a protected ground under the Human Rights Code was part of the reason for the dismissal, that claim has a one-year clock of its own and can be advanced alongside the wrongful dismissal action.
There is no reliable rule of thumb. "A month per year of service" is folklore, not law. The court weighs your age, length of service, the nature of the job and how hard comparable work is to find — and none of that matters if you signed an enforceable termination clause limiting you to the statutory minimums.
Generally yes, provided they give proper notice or pay in place of it. What they cannot do is dismiss you for a reason connected to a protected ground under the Human Rights Code, or as a reprisal for asserting a legal right such as refusing unsafe work or asking about unpaid wages.
Not necessarily. A large proportion of termination clauses in Ontario have been found unenforceable, most often because the cause or withholding language falls short of the Act. If the clause fails, common law notice applies. Have the wording reviewed before accepting the offer.
Not on the spot. Severance offers routinely carry a short deadline and a release, and they are almost always a starting position. Signing the release ends the claim. Get the contract and the offer reviewed before the deadline, and ask for an extension if you need one — most employers grant it.
The Ministry route is free but caps you at the statutory minimums, and filing generally bars a civil action for the same entitlement. Court costs money but is where the common law entitlement lives. On any dismissal with real service behind it, get the choice reviewed before filing anything.
Open your file tonight — a licensed Ontario lawyer will confirm everything with you by tomorrow.