Ontario law lets a grandparent ask a court for contact with a grandchild. It does not give you a right to it. The judge decides on the child's best interests, and a fit parent's decision carries real weight. Here is what actually moves one of these cases.
Our charges include applicable taxes. Disbursements are extra and billed at cost — itemized upfront, in writing, never hidden.
From $1,693.87 taxes included
Under the <a href="https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90c12">Children's Law Reform Act</a>, a parent applies for a parenting order and anyone else — including a grandparent — applies for a <strong>contact order</strong>. The vocabulary changed a few years ago along with the federal legislation, so older material talking about grandparent access is describing the same thing under a retired name.
A contact order gives you time with the child. It does not give you decision-making responsibility over schooling, health care or religion, and it does not make you a parent. A non-parent can apply for decision-making responsibility as well, but that is a far more demanding case, usually brought where the parents cannot care for the child at all.
Where the parents are divorcing, contact can also be sought in the divorce proceeding under the <a href="https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/D-3.4/">Divorce Act</a>, but a person who is not a spouse needs the court's permission to apply. Most grandparent cases proceed under the provincial statute instead, which is generally the simpler route. Note that once a divorce action is commenced, an undetermined Children's Law Reform Act application about contact is stayed except by leave of the court.
Applications go to the Ontario Court of Justice, or to the Family Court branch of the Superior Court of Justice where one operates in your area. Contact and parenting are squarely within the Ontario Court of Justice's jurisdiction, so the absence of any divorce or property issue is not a problem and does not need to be worked around.
Everything is decided on the child's best interests, and the Act sets out the factors: the child's needs and stage of development, the nature and strength of the child's relationship with each parent, grandparent and other family member, the history of care, the child's views and preferences, any family violence, and the willingness of each person to support the child's other relationships.
In practice Ontario courts look at three things. Is there already a meaningful relationship between you and the child? Has the parents' decision to cut contact genuinely damaged it? And is that decision arbitrary, or is it a considered judgment by a functioning parent? A strong answer to the first two and a weak parental justification is what wins these cases.
Deference to parents is real and it is the hardest thing for grandparents to hear. Courts start from the position that fit parents decide who their children spend time with. Judges are slow to override that, and slower still where the application would drop the child into the middle of an adult conflict the child had no part in. What shifts the balance is evidence that the child is losing something real, not evidence that you are.
The child's own views matter, weighted by age and maturity. In a contested case the Office of the Children's Lawyer may become involved to represent the child's interests or report on their views. Their assessment often carries more weight with the court than anything either adult says about the other, which is one reason these cases turn on the child's account rather than yours.
A non-parent applicant has to file more than a parent does. An application for a contact order must be accompanied by a sworn affidavit setting out your proposed plan for the child's care, your involvement in any past family or criminal proceedings, and anything else you know that bears on the child's best interests. The police records check and the children's aid society records search are required only of a non-parent applying for a parenting order giving them decision-making responsibility, not for a contact application.
Go through the informal route first, and be able to prove you did. A short, calm written request for a schedule — dates, duration, where — establishes that you tried and puts the parent's response on the record. Long letters about the parent's failings do the opposite, and they are read aloud in court eventually.
Mediation is worth a genuine attempt. These disputes are almost always about an adult grievance rather than the child, and a mediated schedule that everyone can live with produces more contact than an order won over eighteen months of litigation. A hostile proceeding can also entrench the very refusal you are trying to reverse.
The death of your own child does not create an automatic right to see your grandchild. The surviving parent's decisions still get deference, and you still apply for a contact order on the same best-interests test. It is a sympathetic case, not a different one. See our <a href="/family">family law</a> overview, or compare scopes on <a href="/pricing">pricing</a>.
No. Ontario grandparents have a right to apply for a contact order, not a right to contact. The court decides on the child's best interests, and the Act expressly lists the child's relationship with each grandparent among the factors. But a fit parent's decision about who the child sees is given significant weight, and it is often decisive.
No. Under the Children's Law Reform Act a grandparent applies in their own name without needing the parents' consent or the court's permission first. Permission is required to apply for contact within a divorce proceeding under the federal Divorce Act, which is one reason most grandparent applications proceed under the provincial statute instead.
You can apply, but there is no automatic right. The surviving parent decides who the child spends time with, and courts defer to that. Your case rests on the relationship the child already has with you, the harm to the child from losing it, and whether the parent's refusal is considered or simply an extension of an adult conflict.
A non-parent can apply for decision-making responsibility and parenting time, which is what custody is now called. The bar is much higher than for contact, and these applications succeed mainly where the parents cannot safely care for the child. Children's aid societies also place children with kin, which can be a faster route than litigating.
Usually, weighted by the child's age and maturity. The Office of the Children's Lawyer may be asked to become involved to report on the child's views or represent their interests. Courts are alert to a child who has been coached, so pressing your grandchild for statements to use in the proceeding damages your case badly.
Open your file tonight — a licensed Ontario lawyer will confirm everything with you by tomorrow.