Most easement fights are not about whether the right exists. They are about how far it goes. The registered wording, the reference plan and the registration system the land sits in decide nearly everything. Start there, before anyone builds, gates or blocks anything.
Our charges include applicable taxes. Disbursements are extra and billed at cost — itemized upfront, in writing, never hidden.
From $450.87 taxes included
The common route is an express grant: a transfer or a registered easement, usually created when a larger parcel was divided, identifying the benefiting land, the burdened land and the route on a reference plan. Read it closely. Rights of way vary enormously — foot only or vehicles, at all times or in daylight, with or without the right to run services underneath, and sometimes limited to a stated purpose.
An easement needs a benefiting parcel and a burdened parcel in different ownership, the right has to genuinely accommodate the benefiting land rather than just suit its owner personally, and it must be capable of forming the subject matter of a grant. A right amounting to exclusive possession of the strip is not an easement at all, whatever the instrument calls it.
Easements can also arise by implication when land is divided, or by necessity where a parcel would otherwise be landlocked. Necessity is narrow: inconvenience, a longer route, or a more expensive alternative access is not enough to create one.
Under section 51 of the Land Titles Act, no title or interest adverse to the registered owner can be acquired by any length of possession or by prescription once land is registered under that Act. Because most Ontario land has been converted, long use that started after conversion creates nothing at all. A right that had already matured before conversion survives; one that had not never will.
For land still in the Registry system, the Real Property Limitations Act supports a prescriptive right of way after twenty years of actual, uninterrupted enjoyment as of right, and treats forty years as absolute and indefeasible unless the enjoyment was by written consent. The relevant period is the one immediately before the claim is brought, and an interruption only counts once it has been acquiesced in for a year after notice.
Two traps. Use with the owner's permission is not use as of right, so a friendly arrangement between old neighbours can defeat the whole claim. And no prescriptive right to the access and use of light or air can be acquired in Ontario at all.
The owner of the burdened land still owns the strip and may use it, provided the use does not substantially interfere with the granted right. Gates are the classic argument: a gate is not automatically a substantial interference, but a locked one usually is. Landscaping, parking, speed bumps, snow storage and new underground services all get measured against the same standard.
The benefiting owner cannot enlarge the right either. Using a right of way granted for a residence to service a commercial expansion, or to reach land that was never part of the benefiting parcel, is excessive use and can be restrained. Maintenance follows the document; where it is silent, the benefiting owner generally has a right to repair the way and no right to make the other owner contribute.
Remedies are a declaration setting out precisely what the easement permits, an injunction, and damages. Where the claim is genuinely about an interest in land, you can seek leave to register a certificate of pending litigation, which stops a sale. It is a powerful tool and courts scrutinise it accordingly.
Easements end by written release from the benefiting owner, by merger when both parcels come into the same ownership, by expiry of a stated term, or by abandonment — which is hard to establish, because non-use on its own is generally not enough without evidence of an intention to give the right up permanently. Otherwise it takes an agreement or a court order, and then a registration to clear the title.
If you are buying, search title on both parcels, get a survey showing the physical route against the registered one, and requisition anything inconsistent before closing rather than after. Title insurance may compensate you for a loss, but it will not move a neighbour's fence, widen a laneway, or make an unregistered use lawful.
Get the registered wording and the reference plan, confirm the route on the ground with a survey, then write setting it out with both attached. If the blockage continues, the remedy is an injunction and damages in the Superior Court of Justice. Do not take the fence down yourself without advice — self-help here creates a counterclaim and costs you the moral high ground.
Probably not, if the land is registered under the Land Titles Act — prescription stopped running when the land was converted, and use after that creates nothing. If it is Registry land, twenty years of uninterrupted use as of right may establish a prescriptive right of way, but permission from the owner at any point during that period can defeat the entire claim.
Usually not. A right of way is a right of passage, and parking on it goes beyond that — it becomes a substantial interference the moment it blocks the other owner. Some grants expressly allow parking or loading, so the answer is in the wording. If it is silent, assume passage only and negotiate for more in writing.
Whatever the instrument says. If it is silent, the benefiting owner may generally repair the way to keep it usable, but cannot compel the other owner to contribute. The practical fix is a registered cost-sharing agreement setting out the standard, the split and how work is approved — which also binds whoever buys either property next.
Yes — by release, by merger, or by a court order, each followed by a registration. Expect to pay for a release if the benefiting owner still has any use for the right. A surveyor's evidence that the registered route is physically impossible to use is helpful but not decisive on its own.
Open your file tonight — a licensed Ontario lawyer will confirm everything with you by tomorrow.