In a collaborative file, both parties and both lawyers sign a written commitment not to go to court. If either party litigates, both lawyers must withdraw. That single clause is what makes the process different from ordinary negotiation.
Our charges include applicable taxes. Disbursements are extra and billed at cost — itemized upfront, in writing, never hidden.
From $1,693.87 taxes included
Everything starts with a participation agreement signed by four people: both clients and both lawyers. It commits everyone to resolving the file without court, to voluntary and complete disclosure, and to a working standard of civility. It also contains the disqualification clause: if either party starts a court proceeding, both collaborative lawyers are off the file and neither can act in the litigation.
That clause aligns the incentives. Your lawyer cannot fall back on litigation as a threat or a revenue stream, because litigation ends their retainer. You cannot use the courthouse as leverage without also losing the lawyer you have briefed. Both sides carry a real cost for walking out, which is why collaborative files settle issues that ordinary correspondence between counsel does not.
It also means you should choose the process with your eyes open. If the file collapses, you start again with a new lawyer and pay for them to learn it. That risk is the price of the commitment, and it is not the right price for everyone. The honest test is whether the other party will disclose truthfully and turn up.
Collaborative practice is not mediation. In mediation a neutral runs the room and neither party has a lawyer beside them by default. In a collaborative file you have your own lawyer in every meeting, advocating for you, while the process rules keep the conversation problem-solving rather than adversarial. Our comparison of <a href="/articles/mediation-vs-litigation-ontario-family-law">mediation and litigation</a> covers the other options.
The working sessions are four-way meetings: both clients, both lawyers, in one room or one video call. Issues get identified, information gets exchanged, proposals get floated and reworked in real time rather than through three weeks of letters. Between meetings each party gathers documents, completes disclosure and follows up on whatever was assigned at the last session. Meetings are structured but conversational, and the agenda is set in advance so nobody is ambushed.
Disclosure is voluntary but not optional. Because nobody is going to serve a motion for production, the process depends on both parties producing income, assets, debts and valuations without being forced. A party who hides an account has not just breached the agreement; they have created a contract vulnerable to being set aside later on exactly that ground.
Neutral experts are the underused strength. Instead of duelling valuators, the parties jointly retain one financial neutral to value a business or model support scenarios, or one family professional to help design a parenting plan around how the children actually live. One expert, one report, one fee, and no incentive to skew the numbers toward whoever is paying.
The output is a separation agreement — a domestic contract under the <a href="https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90f03">Family Law Act</a>, enforceable if it is in writing, signed and witnessed. If you also need a divorce, that still requires a court application, but an uncontested one filed on the strength of a signed agreement. Our guide on <a href="/articles/making-a-parenting-plan-ontario">building a parenting plan</a> covers the children's side.
Collaborative practice depends on both parties telling the truth about money. Where you have concrete reason to believe assets are being moved or income understated, you want disclosure obligations a court can enforce, and the ability to bring a motion. Choosing a voluntary process to avoid conflict with someone who is already concealing things costs you time you will not get back.
It also assumes rough parity. Where there is family violence, coercive control or a serious power imbalance, sitting across a table and negotiating is not neutral ground, however skilled the lawyers are. Screening matters here as much as it does in mediation or arbitration, and a responsible collaborative lawyer will say so before the participation agreement is signed rather than after.
Urgency is the third disqualifier. If a child has been wrongfully retained, if the matrimonial home is about to be sold out from under you, or if support has stopped and rent is due, you need an order, not a meeting. Collaborative practice can resume once the emergency is contained, but it cannot substitute for interim relief, and no participation agreement stops a bank, a landlord or a school from acting in the meantime.
Where it does fit, it is usually faster, cheaper and considerably less destructive than a contested file — and under the <a href="https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/D-3.4/">Divorce Act</a> you are expected to try a family dispute resolution process where it is appropriate to do so. Treadstone quotes family work as flat fees, starting from an uncontested divorce at $1,693.87 with taxes included; see <a href="/pricing">pricing</a> and our <a href="/family">family practice</a>.
Both lawyers withdraw and you each retain new counsel for the court case. Documents already disclosed do not disappear, but the settlement discussions are conducted on a without-prejudice basis. Budget for the possibility before you start: the risk of paying a second lawyer to get up to speed is the real cost of the commitment.
In mediation, one neutral runs the process and the parties often attend without lawyers in the room. In a collaborative file, each party has their own lawyer present at every meeting, advocating for them, inside a written no-court agreement. Mediation has no disqualification clause, so either party can leave for court without anyone losing their lawyer.
Yes. It is a domestic contract under the Family Law Act and is enforceable if it is in writing, signed by both parties and witnessed. Support terms can be filed with the court for enforcement. The usual grounds for setting a contract aside still apply, which is why full disclosure during the process matters so much.
Yes, if you want a divorce. Only a court grants one. But with a signed separation agreement resolving property, support and parenting, the divorce itself is an uncontested paper application rather than a contested proceeding. Many couples separate on an agreement and apply for the divorce later, once the one-year separation is complete.
Yes. The process is not tied to marital status, and common-law couples use it for parenting, support and property claims. The agreement produced is a domestic contract in the same way. What changes is the underlying entitlements, since equalization of net family property applies to married spouses only.
Open your file tonight — a licensed Ontario lawyer will confirm everything with you by tomorrow.