TREADSTONE LAW · ONTARIO · DIGITAL LEGAL SERVICES · EST. MMXXI ·TSL
Home/Case Studies/Wills & Estates
№ 302 Case Study — Wills & Estates

Fixing the Books Was the Easy Part of This Estate Plan

A business owner's accountant caught two old tax problems years before they would ever reach a terminal return, and cleaning up the numbers turned out to be the simpler half of making sure the fix actually held.

Wills & Estates8 min readElora, OntarioThe final tax return
All Wills & Estates case studies
ClientWillem, an Elora business owner planning his estate with his wife Femke and office manager Ji-ho
The issueMissed tax instalments and an unresolved old reassessment threatened to complicate Willem's eventual terminal return
ServiceConfirmed the accounting fix, then registered legal authority and documentation to protect it long-term
ResolutionBoth tax issues were resolved and documented, with Willem's will updated and his attorney registered with the tax authority to protect the fix

The situation

Willem called our office on a Tuesday afternoon, not because anything urgent had happened, but because his accountant had told him something that unsettled him more than he expected. Willem owned a small property maintenance business in Elora, the kind of operation that had grown steadily over fifteen years from one truck to a modest fleet, and he had always assumed his tax affairs were in reasonable order. His accountant's review, prompted by nothing more than a routine annual check, had turned up two things: several years of missed personal tax instalments tied to dividends Willem had drawn from the business, and an old reassessment from years earlier that had never actually been resolved, just quietly set aside and forgotten in a file nobody had opened since.

Neither problem was large on its own. The missed instalments meant some accumulated interest, manageable but growing every quarter it went unaddressed. The old reassessment involved a modest disputed amount from a year when the business's bookkeeping, handled at the time by an office manager who had since left, had been less organized than it should have been. Willem's current office manager, Ji-ho, had actually been the one to flag the old file during a records cleanup, noticing a reassessment notice in an old folder that no one seemed to have a clear record of resolving, and bringing it straight to Willem rather than assuming someone else had already dealt with it.

What worried Willem was not the dollar amounts involved. It was the timing. He was fifty-eight, healthy, and had no reason to think his terminal return was anything but a distant, hypothetical event. But he had also just watched a friend's estate get tangled for the better part of a year in a dispute over an old, half-resolved tax matter that no one alive could fully explain, and he did not want his own estate, whenever the time came, to inherit two problems that could be sorted out now, while he was still around to explain the history himself.

His wife Femke, a municipal planner used to dealing with regulatory processes in her own work, agreed that the sensible move was to fix both issues properly now rather than let them sit, and that was the conversation, over dinner the night Ji-ho brought him the old file, that brought Willem to our office the following week.

The legal problem

The accounting side of this was, in the end, genuinely simple. Willem's accountant calculated the missed instalments, arranged for them to be paid along with the accrued interest, and worked with the tax authority to have the old reassessment reviewed and resolved on its merits. Within a few months, both numbers were cleared. That was the practical fix, and it did not require a lawyer to accomplish; a competent accountant could and did handle it entirely on the numbers.

What it did require legal attention for was making sure that fix actually protected Willem, and eventually his estate, the way he assumed it would. The first issue was documentation. A phone call and a payment do not, on their own, create a clear record that a matter has been closed; without a formal written confirmation from the tax authority that both the instalment shortfall and the old reassessment were fully resolved, the file could look, years later, exactly like the one that had tangled Willem's friend's estate: an old dispute with no clear paper trail showing it had ever actually been settled, leaving an executor to guess at a story only Willem could originally tell.

The second issue was practical readiness rather than legal authority. Willem's existing continuing power of attorney for property, drafted years earlier through an online service, already gave his attorney the general authority she would need to manage his tax affairs, since Ontario law does not require a separate clause naming the tax authority before an attorney can act on them. What it did not address was the administrative step still ahead: an attorney only gains standing to deal directly with the tax authority once formally registered as the taxpayer's representative, a process that means filing the document and waiting for it to be processed, and that is far better started in advance than scrambled through after Willem is no longer able to help. His will named Femke as executor but gave her no specific direction about how to handle any outstanding tax matters, an oversight that matters less when everything is already resolved and matters a great deal if it is not, or if a new issue arises after Willem is no longer able to explain it himself.

The third issue tied directly to the business. Willem's corporation, and the dividends he drew from it, were the reason the instalment obligations existed in the first place. His existing corporate documents said nothing about what should happen to those dividend decisions, or who had authority to make them, if he were unable to run the business himself. Without that addressed, the very mechanism that had created the original problem was still sitting there, unprotected, ready to create the same kind of gap again the next time nobody was watching closely enough. Taken together, these three issues meant that the accounting fix, on its own, would have left Willem exactly as exposed as before to the same kind of quiet, years-long drift that had created the problem in the first place.

What we did

We started by mapping out, in plain terms, what Willem's accountant had already fixed and what still needed legal attention, so Willem understood clearly that the two pieces of work were separate and why both mattered. That conversation alone resolved much of his initial anxiety, since he had assumed, wrongly, that once the accountant's part was done, the matter was fully closed.

Once the accountant confirmed both matters were substantively resolved, we requested formal written confirmation from the tax authority for each one, so the estate would have clear documentary proof, not just Willem's recollection or an accountant's file note, that the instalments and the old reassessment had been closed out. That confirmation now sits with Willem's other estate documents, ready for an executor to rely on without having to reconstruct the story from scratch years later, or explain to a skeptical reviewer why an old notice was sitting unresolved in a drawer.

We then reviewed Willem's power of attorney for property, confirmed it already gave his attorney, Femke, the authority she would need to handle his tax affairs, including filing returns, responding to reassessments and making instalment payments, if Willem were ever unable to manage those matters himself, and arranged to have Femke registered with the tax authority as his representative now, while Willem could still sign off on the registration himself, rather than leaving that step for her to start from scratch under time pressure. We paired that with an update to his will, adding direction for his executor about where to find the resolved-matter documentation and confirming the executor's authority to deal with any tax matter that might arise in administering the estate, including the eventual terminal return whenever that day comes.

Finally, we worked with Willem's corporate structure to address the underlying gap. We put in place clear documentation about who could make dividend and compensation decisions on Willem's behalf if he became unable to run the business, tying that authority directly to the updated power of attorney so the same kind of instalment shortfall could not quietly recur through a decision made by someone without a clear mandate to make it. We also set up a simple annual reminder with the accountant, so instalment obligations tied to any future dividend decisions would be flagged before they were missed rather than discovered years later during an unrelated cleanup.

Throughout, we kept Ji-ho involved as the person who had first flagged the issue, since he was also the one most likely to notice if a similar gap opened up again in the business's ordinary bookkeeping, and made sure he knew what documentation to watch for going forward, including how to flag a stray notice from the tax authority before it sat unopened for years the way the old reassessment had.

The outcome

Both tax matters closed within a few months of Willem's first call, with formal confirmation on file for each. The accounting fix, handled by Willem's accountant, cost the business a manageable amount in back interest and resolved the old reassessment on terms the accountant considered fair given the file's history. None of that required litigation or dispute; it was, as Willem had suspected, a fairly ordinary correction, the kind thousands of small business owners go through without ever thinking about the legal side of it at all.

The legal work built around that fix is what will actually matter later. Willem's power of attorney and will now give whoever eventually steps into his shoes, Femke as attorney or executor, or a successor if she is unable to act, clear authority and clear documentation to handle any tax matter connected to his estate, including his eventual terminal return, and Femke is already registered with the tax authority as his representative, so nobody will need to reconstruct a fifteen-year-old paper trail under time pressure, wait on a registration that was never filed, or guess at what Willem would have wanted done. The corporate documentation closes the specific gap that had allowed the instalment shortfall to happen in the first place, and the annual reminder with the accountant means a similar gap is far less likely to open again unnoticed.

Willem's estate, built primarily around the business and the family home, is currently valued in the range of roughly $800,000 to $950,000. Whatever it looks like whenever his terminal return is eventually filed, it will not carry the two loose threads that brought him to our office. Femke has said, more than once since, that the paperwork Willem now keeps with his will made her far less anxious about the idea of ever having to step into the executor role than she had been before, and Ji-ho, for his part, said he now checks the old files every year as a matter of habit rather than waiting for a routine cleanup to stumble across the next one.

What you can learn from this

  • Resolving a tax problem with your accountant is not the same as protecting that resolution; without formal written confirmation on file, an old matter can look unresolved to an executor years later even after it was actually fixed.
  • A continuing power of attorney for property normally lets your attorney handle your tax affairs without any special clause naming the tax authority; the real hurdle is getting the attorney formally registered as your representative, which takes time and is best arranged before it is needed.
  • If your business is the source of a personal tax obligation, such as instalments tied to dividends, make sure your corporate documents address who can make those decisions if you cannot.
  • Fixing an old tax problem years before your eventual terminal return, while you can still explain the history yourself, is far easier than leaving an executor to reconstruct it later.
  • A will that names an executor but gives no direction about outstanding financial matters puts the burden on that person to guess what you would have wanted them to do.
This case study is entirely fictional. It does not describe any real client, file, or matter handled by Treadstone Law, and it is not a real file with details changed. All names, people, properties, businesses, dollar amounts, dates, and events are invented, and any resemblance to a real person, business, or situation is coincidental. Fictional scenarios like this one illustrate the kinds of legal issues people in Ontario commonly face and how a lawyer can help. They are general information, not legal advice — no two matters unfold the same way, and nothing here predicts the outcome of any real case. Reading a case study does not create a lawyer-client relationship. If you are facing something similar, speak with a lawyer about your specific circumstances.

This is a wills & estates problem we handle

Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed lawyer before a dollar is owed.

ContactStart a File →