The situation
Their father died in St. Catharines after a short illness, leaving a will that had not been touched in over a decade. It named his eldest child, Ngozi, as sole executor — the person responsible for winding up the estate, called an estate trustee in Ontario once a court confirms the appointment. At the time the will was signed, Ngozi lived twenty minutes from her father. By the time he died, she had spent nine years in Calgary, working as a construction project manager on commercial builds. Her siblings, Chidi, a sales director, and Kajan, both stayed in Ontario.
The estate was substantial: the family home, a rental property their father had bought in the 1990s, a modest investment portfolio, and a bit of cash sitting in an account. All told, the estate was worth somewhere between roughly $1.2 million and $2.5 million once everything was appraised and totalled, with the home and rental property making up most of the value. Splitting it three ways was straightforward on paper. Getting there was not.
What the probate application uncovered
Ngozi retained our team to apply for a certificate of appointment of estate trustee with a will — the document Ontario's Superior Court issues to formally confirm an executor's authority, often just called probate. Banks, land registry offices and investment firms generally will not release a deceased person's assets to an executor without it, especially for an estate this size.
Early in preparing the application, we flagged something the family had not anticipated. Under Ontario's estate law, an estate trustee who does not live in Ontario is ordinarily required to post a bond — a form of security, similar to insurance, that protects the beneficiaries if the executor mismanages the estate — before the court will issue the certificate. The rule exists because Ontario courts have limited practical ability to supervise or enforce obligations against an executor who lives outside the province if something goes wrong.
There are two common ways around it. The will itself can waive the bond requirement, naming the out-of-province executor and explicitly saying no bond is needed. Or, absent that, every adult beneficiary with full legal capacity can consent in writing to dispensing with the bond. Their father's will did neither — it was drafted years before anyone anticipated Ngozi would move away, and it said nothing about a bond one way or the other. That meant the requirement was live, and it needed a solution before the application could proceed.
For an estate of this size, a bond is not a minor cost. Bonding companies price the premium against the value of the estate assets the executor will control, and for a multi-million-dollar estate that can run into several thousand dollars, charged annually for as long as the estate remains open — which, given a rental property and investment holdings to be sold or transferred, was likely to be a year or more, not a few months.
What we did
- Explained the mechanics to all three siblings, not just the executor. Because the bond exists to protect beneficiaries, Chidi and Kajan's consent was the fastest route around it — but consent only means something if the person giving it understands what they are giving up. We walked all three through what a bond does, what waiving it means in practical terms, and what recourse the siblings would still have against Ngozi as executor even without one, including the standard duty to account for every dollar that moves through the estate.
- Surfaced the underlying trust issue early. Kajan was comfortable signing a consent within a week. Chidi was not, and said so directly: an executor managing a rental property, an investment account, and a home sale from another province, with no bond and no one nearby to catch a mistake, felt like too much exposure for a decade-old will that never contemplated the situation. That was a legitimate concern, not an obstruction, and treating it as one would have poisoned the rest of the administration.
- Proposed a co-executor structure rather than forcing a binary choice. Rather than framing it as bond-or-no-bond, we raised the option of appointing Chidi as a co-executor alongside Ngozi. With an Ontario resident holding equal authority and equal accountability, the practical risk the bond was meant to cover was substantially reduced, and it gave Chidi direct visibility into every decision rather than having to trust updates from across the country.
- Drafted the amended application and supporting consents. Adding a co-executor after a death, when the named executor was someone else, required the court's acceptance and Kajan's formal consent as the remaining beneficiary, plus an updated bond waiver request supported by both estate trustees now being named. We prepared the renunciation and consent paperwork and refiled the application on that basis.
- Set out a joint-decision protocol between Ngozi and Chidi in writing. Co-executors generally must act together on estate transactions — a signature from one is not enough. We put in writing, separate from the court filing, how the two of them would handle routine decisions like paying the rental property's expenses versus major ones like listing the home for sale, so the arrangement did not collapse into a standoff the first time they disagreed.
- Kept Kajan formally informed without giving Kajan decision-making power. Kajan wanted to stay out of day-to-day administration but did not want to be surprised by decisions either. We built a simple standing update — periodic summaries of estate transactions — into the arrangement, satisfying that concern without complicating the executor structure further.
The outcome
The court accepted the amended application, and the certificate of appointment issued naming Ngozi and Chidi as joint estate trustees, without a bond. That resolved the immediate legal obstacle. It did not make the administration effortless.
Joint decision-making meant every transaction — refinancing paperwork on the rental property, agreeing on a real estate agent for the family home, approving the final accounting before distribution — needed both signatures and, in practice, both siblings' genuine agreement, not just a formality. There were points where that slowed things down. Ngozi, managing the estate from Calgary around a demanding job, found the back-and-forth over routine approvals more time-consuming than she had expected when she'd assumed she would simply handle things herself. Chidi, for his part, put in real hours reviewing paperwork and attending appointments neither sibling had budgeted time for.
The rental property sold within the year for close to its appraised value, and the family home sold a few months after that once repairs were completed. Once liabilities, funeral costs and administration expenses were settled, the remaining estate — landing toward the middle of the original range, after selling costs and some repair expenses on the rental property came off the top — was divided three ways as the will directed. Kajan received full distributions on the standard schedule. Ngozi and Chidi, as co-executors, each also took on more unpaid time and responsibility than either had anticipated, which is the real cost of the compromise: no bond premium eaten out of the estate, but two people spending a year coordinating decisions from different provinces instead of one person acting alone.
Nobody in the family got the version of this they would have chosen at the outset. Ngozi would have preferred to administer the estate independently, as her father's will originally intended. Chidi would have preferred more oversight than even a co-executor role gave him. What they ended up with was workable: the estate got settled, no one felt shut out of decisions affecting a joint inheritance, and the family avoided both a bond expense and a fight in court over removing or restricting Ngozi's appointment. That is what a negotiated compromise usually looks like — not the outcome either side wanted most, but one both could live with.
What you can learn from this
- If you name an out-of-province executor in your will, address the bond question directly in the document. A will can waive the bond requirement outright, saving your executor and beneficiaries a negotiation after you are gone.
- An estate bond protects beneficiaries, not the executor. Framing it that way when discussing it with co-beneficiaries makes consent conversations far less adversarial.
- Update your will when your executor's circumstances change. A choice that made sense when everyone lived nearby can create real friction once an executor has moved away.
- A co-executor arrangement can solve a bond problem, but it comes with its own cost: routine decisions take longer when two people must agree on each one, and that time is rarely accounted for in advance.
- Beneficiaries who are not executors still deserve regular, plain updates. A simple standing report can prevent suspicion from building even when someone has no formal role in the administration.
This is a wills & estates problem we handle
Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed lawyer before a dollar is owed.