The situation
Andre and Dimitri worked full-time as security guards, but on evenings and weekends they ran a small side venture installing cameras and alarm panels for landlords who wanted eyes on their rental properties. It was steady, cash-flow-positive work that fit around their shift schedules, and most clients paid on time because the jobs were small and the relationships were local. Late one year, a client named Yanni hired them for a larger job than usual: a package of camera systems and alarm panels across four rental units he owned around Peterborough, priced at roughly $58,000 including equipment and labour.
Yanni paid a deposit of about $18,000 up front, which was enough to cover the cost of the equipment and reassure Andre and Dimitri that the job was worth taking on. They ordered the hardware, cleared a stretch of weekends, and finished the installations across all four properties within about six weeks. Once the work was done and tested, they invoiced the balance of roughly $40,000. Yanni made excuses for a month — a delayed mortgage renewal, a tenant dispute eating into his cash flow — then stopped answering calls and texts altogether. When a certified letter demanding payment went unanswered too, Andre and Dimitri came to Treadstone Law to sue for the outstanding balance.
The claim itself was not complicated to prove. There was a signed contract describing the scope of work, photographs documenting each completed installation, and an unpaid invoice matching the contract price. Yanni was formally served with the claim and never filed a defence, so our team obtained a default judgment — a court order confirming the debt, issued because the person being sued did not respond within the required time. Default judgments are common in straightforward debt claims; a debtor who ignores a lawsuit does not make it go away, they simply forfeit the chance to dispute it. On paper, Andre and Dimitri had won. In practice, nothing had been collected yet, and the real work was about to start.
The collection problem
A judgment is a piece of paper that says a debt is owed and can be legally enforced. It does not, by itself, move any money from the debtor's pocket to the creditor's. Collecting on it requires separate enforcement steps — garnishing wages, seizing and selling personal property, or registering a claim against real property so it has to be paid off before the property can be sold — and every one of those tools only works against assets and income located in Ontario, because that is where an Ontario court order has authority. A judgment does not automatically follow a debtor across a provincial border; it has to be extended there deliberately.
That became the whole problem in Yanni's case. By the time the judgment was issued, he had already sold two of the four rental properties and put the others on the market. Land registry searches turned up no remaining Ontario real estate in his name. A search for wages to garnish came back empty because Ontario employment records showed nothing current. Word reached Andre and Dimitri through a mutual acquaintance that Yanni had moved out west, somewhere in Alberta, though nobody had a current address, and nobody knew where he was working.
This is a common and legitimate worry for anyone who has just won a judgment: the debtor is gone, and the order sitting in a drawer feels worthless. It is not worthless, but collecting on it now meant using a different set of tools than the ones available inside Ontario, and it meant finding Yanni again before any of those tools could be used at all. A judgment also does not sit still while a creditor waits — it accrues interest, but the debtor's trail only grows colder the longer the search takes, so timing mattered.
What we did
- Located the debtor before spending a dollar on enforcement. Enforcement steps cost time and filing fees, and none of them work without a current address or employer. Our team used credit bureau tracing, a Canada Post mail-forwarding trace, and public professional and licensing listings to confirm Yanni had relocated to Alberta and was working there as a security guard, though for a different employer than any he had ever mentioned to Andre or Dimitri. Skip tracing a debtor who has actively relocated can take weeks and does not always succeed, so this step was treated as its own project with its own checkpoints before any court filing was made in Alberta.
- Registered the Ontario judgment in Alberta rather than suing again. Ontario and the other provinces have reciprocal enforcement of judgments legislation that lets a judgment properly obtained in one province be registered in another and then enforced there as if it were a local judgment. Rather than starting an entirely new lawsuit in Alberta and re-proving the underlying debt, our team applied to register the existing Peterborough judgment directly. This is significantly faster than fresh litigation, it avoids duplicating legal costs, and it takes advantage of the fact that Yanni never defended the claim the first time, so there was no risk of him raising new arguments about the original contract.
- Served notice of the registration and waited out the objection period. A debtor is entitled to notice that a judgment has been registered against them in a new province, and is given a set window to object — typically on narrow grounds, such as showing the original judgment was obtained improperly or that proper notice of the original claim was never given. Yanni did not raise any objection, and the registration became final, meaning the judgment was now just as enforceable in Alberta as it had been in Ontario.
- Obtained a garnishment order against his wages. Once the judgment was enforceable locally, our team applied for a garnishment order directing Yanni's Alberta employer to withhold a portion of each paycheque and remit it toward the debt. Garnishment rules protect a minimum amount of income so a debtor is not left with nothing to live on, which meant collection happened gradually, paycheque by paycheque, rather than in one lump sum. That was explained clearly to Andre and Dimitri up front, so they were not expecting a single payment to arrive.
- Tracked payments and kept the file open until it was paid in full. Garnishment orders are not self-monitoring. Our team confirmed deductions were actually being remitted on schedule, followed up promptly when a payment cycle was missed after Yanni briefly changed employers, and had the order redirected to the new employer once the change was confirmed through a fresh trace. Staying on top of a garnishment order over more than a year is often the difference between a judgment that gets paid and one that quietly stalls out.
The outcome
It took roughly fourteen months from the date the judgment was registered in Alberta to the date the full balance was collected. Andre and Dimitri received the entire outstanding $40,000, plus the court costs awarded as part of the original judgment and the interest that had accrued while the debt sat unpaid. The Ontario filing fees, the Alberta registration fees, and the cost of the tracing work were the only real friction in a process that otherwise ran on schedule once Yanni's employer was confirmed and the garnishment order was in place. None of those costs came close to matching the amount recovered, and they were paid from what was collected rather than eating into Andre and Dimitri's own pockets up front.
Andre and Dimitri had assumed, understandably, that a debtor moving provinces was close to a dead end — that Yanni had effectively outrun the judgment by leaving. He had not. The tools exist specifically because debts do not stop being enforceable just because someone crosses a provincial line, but those tools have to be used correctly, in the right order, and the debtor has to be locatable for any of them to matter. A judgment sitting unenforced is not the same as a debt that cannot be collected; it is simply a debt that has not had the right process applied to it yet. In Andre and Dimitri's case, the combination of a proper trace, a reciprocal registration, and a patient garnishment order turned a judgment they had almost written off into a fully recovered debt.
What you can learn from this
- A judgment is not payment. Winning a claim confirms the debt legally, but collecting it requires separate enforcement steps that only work against assets located where the order has authority.
- A debtor moving provinces does not erase a debt. Reciprocal enforcement of judgments legislation lets an Ontario judgment be registered and enforced in another province without starting a new lawsuit.
- Find the debtor before spending money on enforcement. Garnishment and seizure tools are useless without a current address or employer, so tracing should come first.
- Garnishment is gradual by design. Rules protect a minimum living income for the debtor, so full collection through wages typically happens over months, not all at once.
- An open enforcement file needs monitoring. Payments can lapse when a debtor changes jobs, and someone has to notice and redirect the order to keep collection on track.
This is a litigation problem we handle
Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed lawyer before a dollar is owed.