- Trade secret protection in Canada comes from common law, not from a registration system.
- - Written confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with employees, contractors, and any outside parties who had access to sensitive information - Access controls — was sensitive…
- Buyers sometimes assume they can simply have key people sign a broad non-compete after closing to lock down the business's know-how.
Some of what you're paying for in a business purchase never appears on a public registry anywhere. A supplier list built over a decade. A pricing formula. A manufacturing process nobody else has quite replicated. These are trade secrets — and unlike a trademark or a patent, there's no government office to check whether they're "registered" or valid. Their legal protection depends entirely on whether the business actually treated them as secret.
That makes trade secret due diligence a different exercise than most other legal checks in a business purchase. You're not confirming a registration exists; you're confirming a habit of confidentiality actually existed — and figuring out whether it will survive the sale itself.
What Actually Protects a Trade Secret
Trade secret protection in Canada comes from common law, not from a registration system. In general terms, information is more likely to be protected as a trade secret where:
- It genuinely isn't known publicly or easily discoverable by others in the industry
- It has real value to the business precisely because it isn't known to competitors
- The business took reasonable, active steps to keep it confidential
That last point is where due diligence matters most. Information a business treated casually — shared freely with staff, printed on documents with no confidentiality marking, discussed openly with suppliers — is much harder to protect legally, no matter how valuable it might be commercially.
What to Look For in Due Diligence
- Written confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with employees, contractors, and any outside parties who had access to sensitive information
- Access controls — was sensitive information (recipes, formulas, client data, pricing models) restricted to specific people, or generally accessible to anyone on staff?
- Marking and handling practices — were documents or files identifying the information as confidential, or treated the same as any other business record?
- History of past disclosures — has any of this information already been shared with a competitor, a former employee, or the public in a way that could undermine a claim it was ever kept secret?
- Departing-employee history — has a former employee ever left to work for a competitor, and if so, what agreements (if any) governed what they could take or use?
Protecting Know-How Going Forward, After the Sale
Buyers sometimes assume they can simply have key people sign a broad non-compete after closing to lock down the business's know-how. That's more limited than it used to be: general employee non-compete agreements have been prohibited under Ontario's Employment Standards Act, 2000 since October 25, 2021, with only narrow exceptions — most relevantly, where a seller becomes an employee of the purchaser as part of the business sale itself, and separately for certain senior executive roles.
Non-solicitation and confidentiality agreements are a different tool, and remain generally enforceable, subject to ordinary reasonableness limits at common law. This is often the more realistic route for protecting a business's trade secrets and client relationships after a sale — restricting a departing owner or key employee from soliciting clients or disclosing confidential information, rather than trying to stop them from competing outright.
Trade Secret Due Diligence Checklist
- [ ] Identify the specific information that gives the business a competitive advantage
- [ ] Confirm it isn't already public or freely known in the industry
- [ ] Review confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with employees and contractors
- [ ] Check whether access was actually restricted in practice, not just on paper
- [ ] Ask about any past disclosures, leaks, or departing employees who joined competitors
- [ ] Plan non-solicitation and confidentiality protections for key people going forward, rather than assuming a non-compete will cover it
Frequently asked questions
Can I require the seller to sign a non-compete as part of the deal?
Possibly, but it's narrower than many buyers expect. Since 2021, general non-competes are generally prohibited under Ontario employment law, with a specific exception where the seller becomes an employee of the purchaser as part of the sale — this is exactly the kind of clause that needs careful drafting to fit within the exception.
What if the seller never had employees sign confidentiality agreements?
That's a real gap, and it weakens any argument that the information was legally protected as a trade secret. It doesn't necessarily mean the information has no value — but it does mean you should factor that risk into price, and consider having key employees sign proper agreements as part of, or shortly after, closing.
Is a recipe or formula automatically a trade secret just because it's not written down anywhere public?
Not automatically. It needs to meet the general tests — genuine secrecy, real value from that secrecy, and reasonable steps taken to protect it. A business that shares its "secret" recipe informally with anyone who asks may have a harder time claiming trade secret protection.
Does buying the shares of the company protect trade secrets differently than buying its assets?
Not really — trade secret protection depends on how the information was actually handled, not on how the deal is structured. What does differ by structure is whether existing confidentiality agreements with staff automatically continue (more likely in a share sale) or need to be re-papered with the buyer (more likely in an asset sale).
This is a business purchase or sale question
Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.