TREADSTONE LAW · ONTARIO · DIGITAL LEGAL SERVICES · EST. MMXXI ·TSL
Licensed by the Law Society of OntarioFlat fees published upfrontWe reply to messages within 1 business daySign in
Home/Articles/Family Law
№ 77 Family Law

Using Texts and Social Media as Evidence in Ontario Custody Cases

Learn how text messages and social media posts may be used in Ontario custody cases, and how to organize and present them in an affidavit properly.

Family Law4 min readTSLBy the Treadstone Law Team · OntarioUpdated November 13, 2026
← All articles
Key takeaways
  • Under the Divorce Act, the court considers only the child's best interests when making a parenting order or contact order, so how messages and posts apply to your case depends on your situation and is worth confirming with a lawyer.
  • Evidence on a family motion goes in a sworn or affirmed affidavit, and the Superior Court sets page limits for affidavits and exhibits.
  • Keep complete, dated records and stay calm in your own messages, because the other side may use them too.

Texts, emails and social media posts often become the heart of a parenting dispute. They can show how you and the other parent communicate, who handles the child's needs, and what each of you said at the time.

Whether a particular message or post will be accepted and how much weight it gets depends on the facts and on the judge. This article explains the general approach and how to organize what you have. A lawyer can tell you how the rules of evidence apply to your own material.

Why messages matter in a parenting case

Under the Divorce Act, the court considers only the child's best interests and gives primary consideration to the child's physical, emotional and psychological safety, security and well-being. Parents who were never married, or who are not divorcing, need a parenting order under Ontario's Children's Law Reform Act instead. Messages are useful only to the extent that they shed light on those issues.

Among the factors a court looks at are the history of care, each parent's willingness to support the child's relationship with the other parent, each person's ability and willingness to communicate and cooperate, and any family violence. A thread of messages can show co-operation or its absence in a way that general statements cannot.

What tends to help and what tends not to

Courts focus on relevance. Past conduct, for example a mental health history or past substance use, is not considered under the Divorce Act unless it is relevant to the person's exercise of parenting time, decision-making responsibility or contact. The same thinking is a useful guide for messages and posts: ask whether each item bears on the child's care.

More likely to helpLess likely to help
Messages about schedules, exchanges, health and schoolLong arguments about the relationship
Threats or messages that raise safety concernsInsults you also sent
Complete threads that show the full contextSelected lines taken out of context
Posts that bear directly on the child's carePosts that only show a parent's social life

This table is a general guide, not a rule of admissibility. A judge decides what is relevant and what weight it should carry.

Presenting messages properly

A family motion uses Form 14 (Notice of Motion) and Form 14A (Affidavit), and the affidavit must be sworn or affirmed.

In the Superior Court, each party may file one primary affidavit on a motion, limited to 12 pages of narrative for short or regular motions and 20 for long motions. Exhibits should not exceed 10 pages. Those limits do not apply to hearings about the wrongful removal or retention of a child. Page limits and rules change from time to time and differ in the Ontario Court of Justice, so check the current rules for your court.

Social media and your own conduct

Assume anything you post or send may be read by a judge. Venting about the other parent, posting about the case or sending angry messages can hurt your position, because the court considers each parent's willingness to support the child's relationship with the other parent.

How you handle your own messages, posts and accounts once a dispute has started can matter, so it is worth confirming with a lawyer before you delete anything or try to get into another person's accounts. Doing so can create new problems. Ask a lawyer before taking any step to obtain material.

If you are setting up a communication plan, Justice Canada's checklist asks parents to decide how communication will happen, whether by phone, e-mail, text, social media or video chat. A clear plan reduces the heated messages that end up in court.

What to do next

Frequently asked questions

Will a judge accept screenshots of text messages?

It depends on the facts and the judge. A lawyer can advise on how to present yours.

Is there a limit on how much I can file?

In the Superior Court, a primary affidavit on a motion is limited to 12 pages of narrative for short or regular motions, or 20 for long motions, and exhibits should not exceed 10 pages. Rules differ in the Ontario Court of Justice and change over time.

Can old behaviour shown in messages be used against me?

Past conduct is not considered under the Divorce Act unless it is relevant to the person's exercise of parenting time, decision-making responsibility or contact. Relevance is the key question.

Should I keep messaging the other parent?

Where needed for the child, yes, but keep messages brief and respectful. Justice Canada's checklist suggests agreeing in advance how you will communicate.

Sources

Links go to official government, court and regulator pages. The law changes — confirm you are reading the current version.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Ontario laws, tax rates, and government programs change, and how the law applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a licensed Ontario lawyer. Treadstone Law is licensed by the Law Society of Ontario — reach us at 1-844-900-1070 or start a file online.

This is a family law question

Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed lawyer before a dollar is owed.

ContactStart a File →