TREADSTONE LAW · ONTARIO · DIGITAL LEGAL SERVICES · EST. MMXXI ·TSL
Home/Articles/Corporate
№ 433 Corporate

Supply Agreements in Ontario: Key Terms for Buyers and Sellers of Goods

The core terms an Ontario supply agreement should cover — pricing, volume, delivery, inspection, and risk of loss — for both buyers and sellers of goods.

Corporate6 min readTSLBy the Treadstone Law team · OntarioUpdated 2026-07
All articles
Key takeaways
  • A one-off purchase order rarely addresses more than the first two.
  • Pricing terms should specify not just the current price, but the mechanism for changing it — a fixed price for a defined term, an index-linked adjustment, or a right to renegotiate at…
  • Risk of loss At some point in a transaction, responsibility for goods that are lost, stolen, or damaged in transit shifts from seller to buyer.

Many Ontario businesses buy or sell goods for years on nothing more than a purchase order and an invoice. That can work fine — until a shipment arrives damaged, a price dispute breaks out, or a key supplier suddenly stops answering the phone. A proper supply agreement is what settles those questions in advance, instead of leaving them to be argued after something has already gone wrong.

This article sets out the core terms a supply agreement should cover, whether you are the buyer bringing in raw materials or inventory, or the seller shipping goods to a business customer.

The Core Terms, at a Glance

TermWhat It Should Address
PricingHow price is set, whether it can change, and what triggers a change
Volume / forecastingExpected order volumes and how firm those forecasts are
DeliveryTiming, method, and who is responsible for arranging shipping
Inspection and acceptanceHow and when the buyer can reject non-conforming goods
Risk of lossAt what point responsibility for damaged or lost goods shifts from seller to buyer
WarrantiesWhat the seller promises about the goods' quality and fitness
Term and terminationHow long the agreement runs and how either side can exit

A one-off purchase order rarely addresses more than the first two. A standing supply relationship — repeat orders over months or years — genuinely benefits from a master agreement covering the rest.

Pricing and Volume

Pricing terms should specify not just the current price, but the mechanism for changing it — a fixed price for a defined term, an index-linked adjustment, or a right to renegotiate at set intervals. Vague language like "prices subject to change" gives the seller effectively unlimited discretion, which is rarely what a buyer intends to agree to.

Volume terms matter for a different reason: they set expectations about how firm any forecast is. A buyer's non-binding forecast is very different from a binding minimum purchase commitment, and confusing the two is a common source of disputes later.

Risk of Loss and Inspection

Risk of loss

At some point in a transaction, responsibility for goods that are lost, stolen, or damaged in transit shifts from seller to buyer. Absent clear contract language, this can turn into an argument about who bears the loss on a shipment that never arrives. A supply agreement should say plainly whether risk passes on shipment, on delivery, or at some other defined point — and should align that point with who is actually arranging and insuring the shipping.

Inspection and acceptance

The agreement should set out:

Without these terms, a buyer who discovers a problem weeks later may find it far harder to argue the goods were ever non-conforming in the first place.

Warranties and Remedies

Sellers typically warrant, at minimum, that goods will conform to the agreed specifications and be free of defects at the time of delivery. Buyers should look closely at:

Term, Renewal, and Exit

A supply relationship that has run informally for years can be surprisingly hard to unwind if nothing was ever put in writing about how it ends. A proper agreement should specify:

Most commercial contracts in Ontario do not need to be in writing to be enforceable, but an unwritten supply arrangement makes every one of these questions much harder to resolve when the relationship eventually changes.

Frequently asked questions

Do we need a formal supply agreement if we already use purchase orders?

Purchase orders typically cover price and quantity for a single order, not the broader terms — risk of loss, warranties, termination — that govern the relationship as a whole. For any ongoing supply relationship, a master agreement layered under individual purchase orders is usually worth having.

What happens if our supplier just stops shipping without notice?

That depends on what the agreement says about termination and notice. Without a written notice requirement, you may have limited recourse beyond a general breach-of-contract claim, which is why a termination clause is worth negotiating up front rather than after the relationship has already broken down.

Who is responsible if goods are damaged in transit?

This is exactly what a risk-of-loss clause is meant to resolve. Without one, responsibility can depend on shipping terms, insurance arrangements, and general principles that are not always intuitive — a clear clause avoids the argument entirely.

Can we change pricing partway through the term?

Only if the agreement allows it. A price that is stated as fixed for the term generally cannot be unilaterally changed by one side, so any flexibility you want needs to be built into the pricing clause itself.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Ontario laws, tax rates, and government programs change, and how the law applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a licensed Ontario lawyer. Treadstone Law is licensed by the Law Society of Ontario — reach us at 1-844-900-1070 or start a file online.

This is a corporate question

Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.

ContactStart a File →