- A bank lending money to fund a business purchase wants to be first in line if the deal goes wrong.
- Subordinating does not erase the seller's security — it reorders it.
- Subordination is typically set out in a standalone subordination and postponement agreement, signed by the seller in favour of the bank (and often acknowledged by the buyer).
A vendor take-back note feels like solid security to a seller — until the buyer's bank shows up asking to be paid first. In most Ontario business sales where the buyer is borrowing part of the purchase price, the bank will insist that the seller's vendor take-back (VTB) note rank behind the bank's own loan. That process is called subordination, and it is one of the more misunderstood parts of a seller-financed deal.
This article explains why banks ask for it, what it actually costs the seller in practical terms, and how it typically gets documented.
Why Banks Insist on Subordination
A bank lending money to fund a business purchase wants to be first in line if the deal goes wrong. If the seller's VTB note and the bank's loan were both secured against the same assets with equal priority, the bank would effectively be sharing its collateral with the seller — something almost no commercial lender will accept.
Subordination resolves that by having the seller agree, in writing, that the bank's debt and security rank ahead of the seller's, regardless of which one was signed or registered first. Without a subordination agreement in place, most banks simply will not advance the acquisition financing at all.
What Subordination Actually Means for the Seller
Subordinating does not erase the seller's security — it reorders it. The seller's VTB note remains a real, enforceable debt with real security behind it; it just sits behind the bank's claim rather than ahead of or equal to it.
In practice, this usually means two things for the seller. First, if the business fails and its assets are sold to satisfy creditors, the bank gets paid in full before the seller sees anything from those same assets. Second, subordination agreements often restrict what the seller can do while the bank loan is outstanding — for example, limiting the seller's ability to accelerate the note or enforce security without the bank's consent, sometimes through a related standstill arrangement.
How It Is Documented: The Subordination Agreement
Subordination is typically set out in a standalone subordination and postponement agreement, signed by the seller in favour of the bank (and often acknowledged by the buyer). It generally addresses:
- The relative ranking of the bank's debt and security versus the seller's VTB note and security
- Restrictions on payments the buyer can make to the seller while the bank loan is in good standing, and what happens if the buyer defaults on the bank
- Limits on the seller's ability to enforce its own security, demand payment, or accelerate the note without the bank's consent or a notice period
- What happens to the subordination if the bank loan is later refinanced or increased
The Typical Steps in Getting a Subordination Agreement Signed
- The buyer's bank sets subordination as a condition of financing, usually identified early in the loan approval process once the bank knows a VTB is part of the deal.
- The bank (or the buyer's lawyer) provides a draft subordination agreement, often based on the bank's own standard form.
- The seller's lawyer reviews the draft for how far the restrictions go — particularly around payment blockage and the seller's ability to act if the buyer stops paying the note.
- The seller negotiates specific carve-outs where possible, such as a right to receive scheduled payments as long as the bank loan is not in default, or a defined notice-and-cure period before the standstill applies.
- All parties sign the subordination agreement, typically as a condition to closing alongside the purchase agreement, the VTB note, and the bank's own loan documents.
- The agreement is kept with the deal file and referenced again only if the buyer later defaults or the bank financing changes.
What a Seller Should Still Try to Negotiate
Agreeing to subordinate does not mean agreeing to whatever the bank's first draft says. Sellers commonly push for a defined period during which they can still receive scheduled payments provided the bank loan is not in default, notice from the bank before any payment blockage takes effect, and a right to be told promptly if the buyer defaults on the senior loan.
None of this changes the fundamental ranking — the bank remains ahead — but it can materially affect how much practical protection the seller retains while subordinated.
Frequently asked questions
Can I refuse to subordinate my vendor take-back note?
You can, but in most deals that involve bank financing, refusing to subordinate means the deal simply does not close, since the bank will not fund without it. The realistic negotiation is over the terms of subordination, not whether it happens at all.
Does subordination mean I get nothing if the buyer defaults?
No. It means the bank gets paid first from the shared collateral. If there is value left after the bank is satisfied, the seller's security can still apply to it, and the seller retains whatever rights the subordination agreement did not restrict.
Is a subordination agreement the same as a standstill agreement?
They are related but distinct. Subordination is about the ranking of debts and security; a standstill agreement more specifically restricts the seller's ability to act — such as demanding payment or enforcing security — for a period of time, and the two are often used together.
Who prepares the subordination agreement?
It typically comes from the bank or the buyer's lawyer, since the bank has the leverage and the standard-form language. The seller's own lawyer should still review it carefully before it is signed, since it directly limits the seller's rights.
This is a business purchase or sale question
Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.