TREADSTONE LAW · ONTARIO · DIGITAL LEGAL SERVICES · EST. MMXXI ·TSL
Home/Articles/Litigation
№ 358 Litigation

Security for Costs in Ontario: When a Defendant Can Force You to Post Money

What security for costs means in Ontario civil litigation, when a defendant can ask for it, and what happens if a plaintiff can't or won't post it.

Litigation5 min readTSLBy the Treadstone Law team · OntarioUpdated 2026-07
All articles
Key takeaways
  • Security for costs is an amount of money (or sometimes another form of guarantee, like a bond) that a plaintiff can be ordered to post with the court, held to cover the defendant's costs…
  • Ontario's civil procedure rules allow a defendant to bring a motion for security for costs in certain circumstances, generally where there's a real concern that a costs award in the…
  • The defendant brings a motion asking the court to order security for costs, usually early in the litigation.

If you've started a lawsuit in Ontario, one motion you may not expect is a request from the defendant asking the court to make you pay money upfront — before the case is even decided. That's what security for costs does, and it can catch plaintiffs off guard if they're not aware it's a possibility.

The idea isn't that you're paying a penalty for suing. It's a safeguard for the defendant: if you lose and are ordered to pay their legal costs, the court wants some assurance that money will actually be there.

What Security for Costs Means

Security for costs is an amount of money (or sometimes another form of guarantee, like a bond) that a plaintiff can be ordered to post with the court, held to cover the defendant's costs if the defendant ultimately wins and is awarded costs against the plaintiff. It doesn't determine who wins the underlying dispute — it's a procedural safeguard, separate from the merits of the case.

Situations Where a Court Might Order It

Ontario's civil procedure rules allow a defendant to bring a motion for security for costs in certain circumstances, generally where there's a real concern that a costs award in the defendant's favour would be difficult or impossible to collect. Common scenarios include:

An order isn't automatic just because one of these circumstances exists — the court weighs fairness on both sides, including whether requiring security would unfairly block a plaintiff with a genuine claim from being able to pursue it.

How the Process Typically Works

  1. The defendant brings a motion asking the court to order security for costs, usually early in the litigation.
  2. The court considers the plaintiff's financial circumstances, the strength of the claim, and whether ordering security would be fair given the specific facts.
  3. If granted, the court sets an amount and a form (often cash or a bond) and a deadline for posting it.
  4. The case is generally paused — the plaintiff typically can't take further steps in the litigation until the security is posted.

What Happens If the Plaintiff Doesn't Post It

If a plaintiff who's been ordered to post security for costs doesn't do so, the usual consequence is that the claim is stayed (paused indefinitely) or, if the failure continues, dismissed. In practice, this makes a security for costs order a significant strategic event in a case — it's not just a paperwork step, and ignoring it can end a claim entirely.

How to Avoid Being Caught Off Guard

Frequently asked questions

Does security for costs apply in Small Claims Court?

Security for costs motions are far more common in Superior Court litigation. Small Claims Court's simplified process and generally lower cost exposure make this kind of motion less frequent there, though the underlying concern about collectability can still arise in principle.

Can a plaintiff appeal a security for costs order?

Court orders of this kind can generally be challenged through the normal appeal or review routes available in civil litigation, though success depends heavily on the specific circumstances and whether the original decision properly weighed the relevant factors.

Is security for costs the same as posting a bond for an injunction?

No — they serve different purposes. Security for costs protects a defendant's potential costs award in an ordinary lawsuit; an undertaking or bond connected to an injunction typically protects against harm caused by the injunction itself if it turns out to have been wrongly granted.

Does having a lawyer help avoid a security for costs motion?

Being represented doesn't prevent a defendant from bringing the motion, but proper advice early on can help you understand your exposure, prepare a stronger response if it happens, and sometimes resolve the concern before it becomes a formal motion at all.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Ontario laws, tax rates, and government programs change, and how the law applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a licensed Ontario lawyer. Treadstone Law is licensed by the Law Society of Ontario — reach us at 1-844-900-1070 or start a file online.

This is a litigation question

Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.

ContactStart a File →