TREADSTONE LAW · ONTARIO · DIGITAL LEGAL SERVICES · EST. MMXXI ·TSL
Home/Articles/Buying & Selling a Business
№ 373 Buying & Selling a Business

Reviewing and Updating Key Customer Contracts After an Ontario Business Acquisition

What a new owner should check in a business's existing customer contracts to confirm they still bind after an Ontario business sale.

Buying & Selling a Business5 min readTSLBy the Treadstone Law team · OntarioUpdated 2026-07
All articles
Key takeaways
  • In a share purchase, the corporation that signed the customer contracts does not change — it is the same legal party to the agreement before and after closing.
  • - Assignment / anti-assignment clause — does the contract allow assignment freely, require consent, or prohibit it outright?

A business is often worth what it is worth because of its customer relationships — and those relationships are frequently formalized in contracts that were negotiated long before you showed up as the buyer. Confirming those contracts actually still bind, on the same terms, after your acquisition closes is not a formality. It is one of the more consequential pieces of post-closing legal work, and the answer depends heavily on how your deal was structured.

Share Purchase or Asset Purchase Changes the Whole Question

In a share purchase, the corporation that signed the customer contracts does not change — it is the same legal party to the agreement before and after closing. Contracts generally continue automatically, with one important exception: many commercial contracts contain a change-of-control clause that gives the customer a right to consent, renegotiate, or even terminate if ownership of the contracting corporation changes hands. A share sale does not need consents to assign the contract, but it can still trigger a change-of-control right buried in the fine print.

In an asset purchase, the buyer is a new legal party. Existing contracts generally do not transfer automatically — they need to be formally assigned, and most commercial contracts either prohibit assignment without consent or are silent (in which case general contract law principles about assignability apply). Reviewing every material customer contract for an assignment clause is a standard, necessary step, not an optional extra.

Key Clauses to Check in Each Material Customer Contract

A Practical Review Process

  1. Identify the material contracts. Not every customer needs a full legal review — focus on the contracts that represent meaningful revenue or strategic relationships, as identified during due diligence.
  2. Pull the actual signed documents, not just a summary or the customer's name on a list. Amendments and side letters matter as much as the original agreement.
  3. Confirm deal structure first, since it changes what you are even looking for (assignment mechanics versus change-of-control triggers).
  4. Flag anything requiring consent or notice, and track whether that consent was obtained before or at closing, or still needs to be chased down.
  5. Update your own records — contact names, notice addresses, and billing details — so the relationship transitions smoothly on the customer's side too, separate from the legal question of whether the contract still binds.
  6. Loop in the customer proactively where appropriate. Sometimes maintaining the relationship matters more than the technical legal position, especially with a long-standing key account.

What to Do If a Contract Requires Consent

If a material customer contract requires consent to assignment (typical in an asset purchase) or gives a termination or renegotiation right on change of control (possible even in a share purchase), do not assume silence means acceptance. Address it directly:

Frequently asked questions

If we did a share purchase, do we really need to review every customer contract?

You should still review the material ones. Even though a share sale does not require assignment, change-of-control clauses can still give a customer rights you need to know about before they surface as a surprise.

What happens if a key customer contract turns out not to be assignable?

This depends on the specific clause and the leverage in the relationship. Sometimes the customer will consent once approached directly; sometimes the purchase agreement already accounted for the risk through a price adjustment or indemnity. This is worth raising with your lawyer as soon as it is identified, ideally before closing.

Do verbal customer arrangements need the same review as written contracts?

Verbal arrangements are harder to review by definition, but they are not immune from the same underlying issues. If a customer relationship is significant and not documented, that itself is worth flagging during due diligence.

Should we tell customers about the ownership change even if their contract doesn't require it?

Many buyers choose to communicate proactively for relationship reasons, separate from any legal notice requirement. Your lawyer can help you time and word any required legal notices correctly alongside that broader communication.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Ontario laws, tax rates, and government programs change, and how the law applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a licensed Ontario lawyer. Treadstone Law is licensed by the Law Society of Ontario — reach us at 1-844-900-1070 or start a file online.

This is a business purchase or sale question

Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.

ContactStart a File →