- Reasonable to add back: the portion of the owner's salary, bonus, and benefits that exceeds what a replacement manager would actually cost to run the same role.
- Reasonable to add back: compensation paid to a family member who performs no actual work for the business, if this can be documented.
- Reasonable to add back: clearly personal costs with no business purpose — a family vacation booked as a "business trip," for example — provided there's documentation.
Every "add-back" in a seller's earnings summary is a claim: that a particular expense wouldn't apply to you as the new owner, so it should be excluded when you're assessing what the business truly earns. Some of these claims are entirely reasonable. Others are optimistic at best. The problem for a buyer is that the earnings figure you're evaluating the entire deal against is only as reliable as the individual add-backs that built it.
Rather than treating add-backs as a single category to accept or reject wholesale, it helps to go through them type by type — because the right level of scrutiny differs quite a bit depending on what's actually being added back.
Owner Compensation and Benefits
This is usually the largest and most defensible add-back category — but also the easiest to overstate.
Reasonable to add back: the portion of the owner's salary, bonus, and benefits that exceeds what a replacement manager would actually cost to run the same role.
Requires scrutiny: whether the seller is adding back their entire compensation, implying the business could run with no management cost at all — which is rarely realistic unless you personally intend to run it full-time with no replacement hire.
Ask what a market-rate general manager would cost for this specific business, and use that as the benchmark for how much of the owner's pay is a legitimate add-back versus a real, ongoing cost of running the business.
Family Members on Payroll
Reasonable to add back: compensation paid to a family member who performs no actual work for the business, if this can be documented.
Requires scrutiny: family members who do perform real work, even if underpaid or overpaid relative to market rate — the correct adjustment here is to normalize their pay to market rate for the actual work done, not to add back the full amount as if the role disappears entirely.
Personal Expenses Run Through the Business
Reasonable to add back: clearly personal costs with no business purpose — a family vacation booked as a "business trip," for example — provided there's documentation.
Requires scrutiny: mixed-use expenses like a vehicle, phone, or home office that has some genuine business use. These need to be prorated, not fully added back, and the seller should be able to explain and support the split.
"One-Time" or Non-Recurring Items
Reasonable to add back: a genuinely unusual event — a one-off lawsuit settlement, a casualty loss, a single unusually large bad debt.
Requires scrutiny: items labelled "one-time" that appear in the financials more than once across the years you're reviewing. If it recurred, it isn't one-time, and it belongs in the ongoing cost picture of the business rather than out of it.
Discretionary and Above-Market Costs
Reasonable to add back: clearly discretionary spending — sponsorships, donations, or club memberships that reflect the owner's personal preferences rather than business necessity.
Requires scrutiny: costs the seller labels "discretionary" that a buyer would likely need to keep paying to maintain the business's reputation, customer relationships, or community standing (for example, a sponsorship tied to a key referral source).
Related-Party Transactions
Reasonable to add back: a clearly above-market rent or supply cost paid to an entity the seller also owns, adjusted down to a documented fair market rate.
Requires scrutiny: any related-party arrangement generally, since it's the category most vulnerable to manipulation — the seller controls both sides of the transaction, so pricing can be set to make the target business look however the seller wants it to look. Always ask what an arm's-length price would actually be, and get independent evidence (comparable market rates) rather than accepting the seller's own number.
How to Evaluate Any Add-Back: A Four-Question Test
- Is there documentation? An invoice, receipt, contract, or bank record — not just a line in a spreadsheet.
- Would this cost genuinely disappear for a new owner, or would you likely need to replace it in some form?
- Does it recur across multiple years, despite being labelled non-recurring?
- Is it a related-party transaction, and if so, is the pricing actually arm's length?
If an add-back fails more than one of these questions, treat the earnings figure as overstated by that amount until the seller can satisfy your concerns.
Frequently asked questions
Should I just reject every add-back I can't fully verify?
Not necessarily reject outright, but you should discount or exclude anything unverified from the earnings figure you rely on for your own decision-making, and ask the seller to substantiate it before it factors into your view of the business's value.
Who normally prepares the add-back schedule — the seller or an independent party?
It's typically prepared by the seller or their broker/accountant, which is precisely why an independent review matters. For anything beyond a small transaction, having your own accountant review the add-back schedule against source documents is standard practice.
Can inflated add-backs be addressed in the purchase agreement itself?
Representations and warranties about the accuracy of financial statements can give you a remedy if a seller's add-backs turn out to be based on inaccurate information, but this depends on how those provisions are drafted and whether they survive closing — it's not a substitute for verifying the numbers up front.
Is it reasonable to ask for the seller's personal tax returns to cross-check add-backs?
This is sometimes requested, particularly for compensation-related add-backs, though sellers don't always agree to provide personal returns. Corporate-level documentation (payroll records, T4s issued by the business) is usually sufficient and less contentious to request.
This is a business purchase or sale question
Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.