- Employers generally have the right to dismiss an employee without cause, provided they give proper notice or pay in lieu.
- When an employee is dismissed without cause, Ontario law generally entitles them to compensation for the notice period they should have received — as if they had continued working…
- Employers sometimes include contract or plan language stating that an employee must be "actively employed" on the payment or vesting date to receive a bonus, commission, or equity award…
Few things feel worse than being let go days or weeks before a bonus payout, a commission you have already earned, or a vesting date for stock or other incentive compensation. If the timing seems too convenient to be a coincidence, you may be right to be suspicious — and Ontario law gives dismissed employees real tools to challenge that kind of timing.
This article explains the general principles courts apply when an employer's timing looks designed to avoid paying compensation that would otherwise have come due.
Why Timing Raises a Red Flag
Employers generally have the right to dismiss an employee without cause, provided they give proper notice or pay in lieu. What they are not permitted to do is exercise that right dishonestly or in bad faith, specifically to deprive an employee of compensation that had, in substance, already been earned or was about to become payable.
A dismissal that happens to land just before a bonus payment, commission payout, or vesting date is not automatically improper — sometimes the timing really is coincidental, driven by unrelated business reasons. But when the timing is suspicious and unexplained, it invites scrutiny.
The General Rule: Bonuses Can Be Part of Your Damages
When an employee is dismissed without cause, Ontario law generally entitles them to compensation for the notice period they should have received — as if they had continued working through it. Where bonus, commission, or other incentive pay is a regular and integral part of an employee's compensation, courts will often include an amount reflecting what the employee would likely have earned during that notice period, not just base salary.
This means a bonus or vesting event that would have occurred during what should have been your notice period can sometimes still factor into what you are owed, even though your employment actually ended beforehand.
When a Contract Clause Tries to Cut You Off
Employers sometimes include contract or plan language stating that an employee must be "actively employed" on the payment or vesting date to receive a bonus, commission, or equity award — explicitly trying to exclude anyone who is dismissed beforehand, even during a notice period.
Whether this kind of clause actually works depends heavily on how clearly and unambiguously it is worded, and on general principles of contract interpretation that apply in Ontario. Poorly drafted or ambiguous language is often interpreted against the party that wrote it, and courts have shown real skepticism toward clauses that appear designed purely to defeat an employee's damages. Whether a specific clause holds up is a fact-specific legal question, not something to assume either way from the wording alone.
What Courts Generally Look At
- Whether the bonus or incentive was a regular, expected part of compensation, or truly discretionary and unpredictable
- How close the dismissal was to the payment or vesting date
- Whether the employer offered any real explanation for the timing
- The precise wording of any clause purporting to cut off entitlement on termination
- Whether the employee had already substantially completed the work the bonus or incentive was meant to reward
Steps to Protect Your Position
- Gather your compensation history. Pay stubs, bonus statements, commission structures, and any plan documents help establish what you would likely have received.
- Get a copy of your full employment contract and any bonus, commission, or equity plan documents. The exact wording of these documents matters enormously.
- Write down the timeline. Note the dismissal date, the payment or vesting date, and anything the employer said about why the timing worked out the way it did.
- Do not assume a "must be actively employed" clause is the end of the story. These clauses are often challenged successfully, depending on their wording and the circumstances.
- Get a lawyer's opinion before accepting a severance offer that appears to exclude bonus, commission, or equity value without explanation.
Frequently asked questions
Is a discretionary bonus treated the same as a guaranteed one?
Not necessarily. A bonus described as fully discretionary, and genuinely administered that way in practice, is generally harder to claim than one that has been paid consistently and predictably, effectively functioning as a regular part of compensation.
What if my contract clearly says I forfeit any bonus if I'm not employed on the payment date?
Such clauses are common, but whether they are enforceable depends on how clearly they are worded and how they interact with your notice-period entitlement. Courts have sometimes found this kind of language does not go far enough to exclude damages for the notice period, though outcomes vary with the specific wording.
Does this apply to stock options and RSUs, not just cash bonuses?
The same general principles can extend to equity compensation, though the analysis often involves additional plan-specific rules — the exact wording of the equity plan documents matters just as much as it does for cash bonuses.
How soon after being let go should I raise this issue?
As soon as possible. Compensation documents and plan terms are easier to gather while your employment is fresh, and general limitation periods for pursuing a claim eventually run out.
This is a litigation question
Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.