How are political activities different from prohibited partisan activities for a registered charity?
A registered charity can generally engage in public policy dialogue and development activities connected to its charitable purposes — commenting on proposed legislation, encouraging supporters to contact their elected representatives, or publishing research aimed at influencing government policy — without putting its registration at risk, as long as those activities support rather than replace its charitable work. Following reforms to how the Canada Revenue Agency treats this area, charities now have considerably more room to speak on policy issues than many still assume.
Partisan political activity is different and remains prohibited outright, regardless of how connected it is to the charity's purpose: a registered charity cannot support or oppose a specific political party or candidate for public office, in any way, at any time. That line does not bend based on good intentions or how directly the issue relates to the charity's mission.
The practical risk area is less the broad rule and more the specific action — sharing a candidate's campaign material, for example, even informally, can cross into partisan territory even if the charity's underlying policy position is entirely legitimate. Charities that are active on public policy issues should have clear internal guidelines for staff and volunteers about what crosses that line.
Key takeaways
- Charities can generally engage in policy advocacy connected to their charitable purposes.
- Supporting or opposing a specific political party or candidate is always prohibited, with no exceptions.
- The rule doesn't bend based on how closely tied the issue is to the charity's mission.
- Clear internal guidelines help staff and volunteers avoid inadvertently crossing into partisan activity.