TREADSTONE LAW · ONTARIO · DIGITAL LEGAL SERVICES · EST. MMXXI ·TSL
Licensed by the Law Society of OntarioFlat fees published upfrontWe reply to messages within 1 business daySign in
Home/Articles/Real Estate
№ 22 Real Estate

Neighbour Built Over the Property Line in Ontario: Your Options

Learn how Ontario law treats a garage, shed or addition that crosses the boundary, from injunctions and damages to time limits and adverse possession.

Real Estate5 min readTSLBy the Treadstone Law Team · OntarioUpdated November 1, 2026
← All articles
Key takeaways
  • A court can order a neighbour to stop or undo something through an injunction, and it can award damages in addition to or instead of one.
  • The basic limitation period is two years from discovery, but a claim seeking only a declaration of where the boundary lies has no limitation period.
  • Whether a neighbour can gain rights over your land by long use depends heavily on whether the land is under the Land Titles Act.

You have found that your neighbour's garage, shed, deck or addition sits partly on your land, or you have been told that yours sits on theirs. It is a stressful discovery, and the instinct is often to demand that it be torn down right away.

The law gives you several paths, and which one fits depends on the survey, how long the structure has been there and what you want in the end. This article explains the main tools in plain terms so you can ask better questions of a lawyer.

Start by confirming where the line really is

Everything else depends on the facts about the boundary. Fences, hedges and old stakes are often not on the legal line. A current survey from a licensed surveyor, along with your property's registered description, is the usual starting point.

If the only disagreement is where the boundary lies, there is no limitation period for a proceeding that seeks only a declaration with no further relief, such as a declaration of where the boundary is. That can be a useful first step when the structure itself is not the main concern.

What a court can order

A judge of the Superior Court of Justice may grant an interlocutory injunction or a mandatory order where it appears just or convenient to do so. In practice, this is the legal route to asking a court to stop construction or to require something already built to be dealt with.

A court that can grant an injunction may also award damages in addition to the injunction or in place of it. This means a court is not limited to an all-or-nothing choice, and money may be part of the result. What a judge decides in a particular case depends on the evidence and cannot be predicted from general rules.

If you only want money, the Small Claims Court hears money claims up to $50,000, not counting interest and costs. Claims above that amount are outside that limit. Whether a claim that also involves an injunction can be brought there is worth confirming with a lawyer.

Time limits that matter on both sides

The basic limitation period is two years from the day the claim was discovered. A claim is discovered on the earlier of the day you actually knew the relevant matters and the day a reasonable person in your circumstances ought to have known them, and you are presumed to have known on the day the act or omission happened unless you can prove otherwise.

There is also an ultimate period: no proceeding may be started after the 15th anniversary of the day the act or omission took place, whatever the date of discovery. The exception is a proceeding seeking only a declaration, such as a declaration of where a boundary lies, which has no limitation period.

Separate rules apply to land itself. An action to recover land must be brought within ten years, and when that period ends the right and title of the person who failed to act is extinguished. Do not assume you have time to wait; the right deadline depends on the facts.

Long use, adverse possession and easements

A neighbour who has used part of your land for many years may claim they now have rights to it. The ten-year limit for an action to recover land is one rule that may matter in that kind of situation. There is an important exception: for land registered under the Land Titles Act, no title or interest adverse to the registered owner can be acquired by any length of possession or prescription.

That exception has its own exception. It does not defeat an adverse possession claim against a first owner registered with only a possessory title, if the claimant was in possession when that first owner was registered. Which system your land is under, and when it was converted, is something to check on the parcel register.

A right of way or other easement based on use cannot be defeated once it has been enjoyed for the full period of twenty years, and it becomes absolute after forty years, unless it was enjoyed under express consent given by deed or in writing. This is why written permission matters if you let a neighbour use part of your land.

What to do next

Many encroachments end in a written agreement, a transfer of a small strip of land or a negotiated removal. A lawyer can explain which outcome is realistic for your situation.

Frequently asked questions

Can I force my neighbour to remove a structure that crosses the line?

You can ask a court for an injunction or a mandatory order where it appears just or convenient. A court can also award damages in addition to or instead of an injunction. The result depends on the facts, so it is worth getting advice before you start.

How long do I have to act?

The basic limitation period is two years from the day the claim was discovered, with a 15-year ultimate period. Claims to recover land have a ten-year period. A lawyer can tell you which applies to you.

Can my neighbour end up owning part of my land?

For land registered under the Land Titles Act, no title adverse to the registered owner can be acquired by possession or prescription. That bar applies only once a parcel has been converted to Land Titles, and a claim that matured before conversion may survive, so the conversion date on the parcel register matters. There is also an exception for first owners registered with only a possessory title. For other land, the ten-year rule for recovering land is relevant.

Is it a fence or a boundary tree problem instead?

A tree growing on the boundary is the common property of the adjoining owners, and injuring or destroying it without consent is an offence under the Forestry Act. A boundary fence dispute may go through the municipal clerk and fence-viewers, unless a municipal fence by-law applies.

Sources

Links go to official government, court and regulator pages. The law changes — confirm you are reading the current version.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Ontario laws, tax rates, and government programs change, and how the law applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a licensed Ontario lawyer. Treadstone Law is licensed by the Law Society of Ontario — reach us at 1-844-900-1070 or start a file online.

This is a real estate question

Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed lawyer before a dollar is owed.

ContactStart a File →