TREADSTONE LAW · ONTARIO · DIGITAL LEGAL SERVICES · EST. MMXXI ·TSL
Licensed by the Law Society of OntarioFlat fees published upfrontWe reply to messages within 1 business daySign in
Home/Articles/Wills & Estates
№ 22 Wills & Estates

How to Contest a Will in Ontario: Grounds and Steps

Learn the main legal grounds for challenging a will in Ontario, who must prove what, and the first practical steps if you think a will is invalid.

Wills & Estates4 min readTSLBy the Treadstone Law Team · OntarioUpdated October 28, 2026
← All articles
Key takeaways
  • The person defending a will must prove due execution, knowledge and approval of its contents, and testamentary capacity.
  • A challenger can raise suspicious circumstances evidence, which then sends the legal burden back to the person defending the will.
  • A notice of objection can stop the court registrar from issuing probate, so a judge's order may be required.
  • Time limits and procedures vary with the type of claim, so confirm deadlines with a lawyer early.

Finding out that a parent's will leaves you out, or differs sharply from what you were told, is upsetting. Before you act, it helps to understand what a court actually looks at. The focus is on whether the will was validly made and whether the person understood what they were doing.

This article explains the main grounds for challenging a will in Ontario, who carries the burden of proof, and the first steps people commonly take. It is general information, not advice for your situation.

The main grounds for a challenge

The party propounding a will, meaning the person asking the court to uphold it, carries the legal burden of proving three things: due execution, knowledge and approval of the contents, and testamentary capacity. Challenges usually target one or more of these.

GroundWhat it asks
Improper executionWere two witnesses present at the same time, and did they see the testator sign?
Lack of capacityDid the person understand the nature and effect of a will, the property involved and the claims to be given effect to?
Lack of knowledge and approvalDid the person know and approve what the will said?
Undue influenceWas the person pressured so the will reflected someone else's wishes? The burden is on the party attacking the will.

How suspicious circumstances change the burden

A challenger can meet an initial evidential burden with evidence of suspicious circumstances that, if accepted, would tend to negative knowledge and approval or capacity. The legal burden then reverts to the party defending the will.

Where suspicious circumstances raise doubt about capacity, the person defending the will must prove capacity on a balance of probabilities. This is different from undue influence, where the burden stays on the person attacking the will.

In one reported case, the judge found insufficient evidence of compliance with formalities where only one interested person's uncorroborated evidence supported execution, and also noted probable lack of capacity and suspicious circumstances.

First steps in an Ontario challenge

Court procedures for notices of objection can change, so older descriptions may be out of date. A lawyer can confirm the current steps and time limits.

Protecting assets and understanding limits

If you worry that assets will be distributed while the dispute is open, the court can order interim preservation. It considers whether the assets are the subject of the dispute, whether there is a serious issue to be tried, and the balance of convenience, and may impose conditions.

These applications can fail. One application to stop distribution of an estate failed at the threshold, and the applicant was ordered to pay costs.

There is also a point about timing. There is no limitation period for a proceeding seeking only a declaration, such as that a will is valid or invalid, if no consequential relief is sought. Many claims seek more than a declaration, so do not assume you have unlimited time. Ask a lawyer about your deadlines promptly.

What to do next

Frequently asked questions

Is it enough that a will seems unfair?

Unfairness alone is not one of the grounds listed here. The grounds focus on whether the will was properly executed, whether the person had capacity and knew and approved the contents, and whether undue influence was involved.

Who has to prove the will is valid?

The party propounding the will carries the legal burden on due execution, knowledge and approval, and capacity. For undue influence, the burden is on the party attacking the will.

What does a notice of objection do?

It can stop the registrar from issuing probate, so a judge's order may be required. The applicant must also send the objector a notice and file proof of service.

Will the estate pay for my challenge?

Not automatically. Costs come out of the estate only where public policy considerations apply, such as giving effect to valid wills of competent testators or litigation caused by the testator.

Sources

Links go to official government, court and regulator pages. The law changes — confirm you are reading the current version.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Ontario laws, tax rates, and government programs change, and how the law applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a licensed Ontario lawyer. Treadstone Law is licensed by the Law Society of Ontario — reach us at 1-844-900-1070 or start a file online.

This is a wills & estates question

Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed lawyer before a dollar is owed.

ContactStart a File →