- Non-exempt property acquired during the marriage or relationship is presumed to be shared equally.
- The Court can depart from equal sharing where it would not be just and equitable after considering the s. 8 matters.
- The s. 8 list is broad and includes contributions, length of the relationship, agreements and dissipation of property.
Many people assume property is always split fifty-fifty. In Alberta, equal sharing is the starting point, but it is not the end of the story if an equal split would be unfair.
This article explains the factors a judge considers, how the rule works, and what to think about if you believe your situation calls for something different.
This article covers the law of Alberta.
Equal sharing is the starting point
For spouses, property acquired during the marriage that is not exempt is distributed equally. Adult interdependent partners have the same rule for property acquired after their relationship began.
That presumption yields where an equal split would not be just and equitable after the Court considers the s. 8 matters. In other words, unequal division is possible where those s. 8 matters point that way.
The Family Property Act is the former Matrimonial Property Act renamed, and the changes took effect January 1, 2020. It applies to adult interdependent partners as well as married spouses. An adult interdependent partner is a person who has lived with another in a relationship of interdependence for at least 3 years, for less than 3 years with some permanence if they have a child together, or for any period if they have signed an adult interdependent partner agreement.
Timing matters. Spouses who were divorced or living separate and apart before January 1, 2020 generally stay under the old Matrimonial Property Act, except that ss. 15 and 18 of the new Act apply if the event or separation was on or after February 1, 2012. For adult interdependent partners, the Act applies only if they had not begun living separate and apart, and had not become former partners, before January 1, 2020. If this may affect you, it is worth confirming with a lawyer.
The factors a judge considers
- Contributions to the marriage and family welfare, including homemaking and parenting.
- Contributions to a business, farm or enterprise.
- Contributions to acquiring, keeping or improving property.
- Each party's income, earning capacity, liabilities, obligations, property and resources at the start and at trial.
- The length of the marriage or relationship.
- Whether property was acquired while the parties lived separate and apart.
- Any oral or written agreement.
The list continues with substantial gifts to third parties or transfers to non-bona fide purchasers, earlier distributions, earlier court orders, tax liability from a transfer or sale, dissipation of property to the other's detriment, and any other relevant fact or circumstance.
In plain words, these factors let a judge look at the whole picture, not only whose name is on an account or a title. The Court may divide all property owned by the spouses or partners, whether it is owned jointly or individually.
Conduct, debts and what is not covered
The s. 8 list ends with any other relevant fact or circumstance, so the Court is not limited to the specific items listed above. The listed items include dissipation of property to the other's detriment, and substantial gifts to third parties or transfers to non-bona fide purchasers. Where a transfer or substantial gift was made to defeat a claim, the recipient was not a bona fide purchaser for value, and the recipient knew or ought to have known the purpose, the Court can order property returned, give a money judgment against the recipient, or count the property as part of the transferor's share, but action against a recipient is available only for transfers made not more than one year before the application.
The Act has no stand-alone debt-division section. Liabilities and obligations are considered under s. 8(d) when deciding whether an equal division is just and equitable.
Unless a written agreement that meets s. 38 provides otherwise, property to be distributed is valued as of the trial date. A written agreement that meets s. 38 may set a different valuation date. Pension plan benefits and locked-in retirement accounts may not be transferable or payable where the governing legislation does not allow it, but the Court must still value them and distribute their value under the Act. The Court also has wide powers to order payment of money, transfer of an interest in property, sale and division of proceeds, or payment by instalments.
How hard is it to succeed?
Because equal sharing is the presumption for non-exempt property, any different result depends on the s. 8 matters. How a judge weighs the factors depends on the evidence and the facts, and outcomes cannot be predicted in general.
Some property is not subject to the equal rule at all. Exempt property, such as gifts received from a third party, inheritances and property owned before the relationship, is handled separately, and growth in its value is shared on the just-and-equitable basis. A valid s. 38 agreement can also displace the Act's division rules.
Some property that might look exempt is also distributed on the just-and-equitable basis rather than being exempt or automatically split equally:
- The growth in value of exempt property, including property obtained by exchange or from sale proceeds.
- Property bought with income from exempt property during the marriage or relationship.
- Property acquired after a decree nisi, nullity, judicial separation or declaration of irreconcilability, or after partners became former partners.
- Gifts between spouses or partners.
What to do next
Time limits apply. For spouses, an application based on separation must be brought within 2 years after the date the spouses separated, and a single reconciliation period of up to 90 days is not counted. Adult interdependent partners have 2 years from the date they knew, or should have known, the relationship had ended. A claim is started by a Statement of Claim for Division of Family Property (Form FL-2), or Form FL-3 where it is combined with a divorce claim, and the Court of King's Bench manual (June 2026) says it is filed with Form FL-10 if property is at issue. Confirm the current forms with the Court before filing.
- List what you own, what you owe and when each item was acquired.
- Document your contributions, including homemaking, parenting and work in a family business.
- Gather proof of any large transfers, gifts or spending that concern you.
- Find any agreements you signed about property.
- Be ready to give a sworn statement of all your property.
- Talk to a lawyer about whether the factors support a different split.
Frequently asked questions
Is an equal split guaranteed in Alberta?
No. Equal sharing is the presumption for non-exempt property, but it yields where an equal split would not be just and equitable after the Court considers the s. 8 matters.
Does a short relationship change the split?
The length of the marriage or relationship is one of the matters the Court considers. How much weight it gets depends on the other facts.
Can parenting and homemaking count?
Yes. The Court considers contributions to the marriage and family welfare, including homemaking and parenting.
What if my spouse gave away or wasted property?
Dissipation of property to the other's detriment is a listed matter. The Court can also act against the recipient of a transfer made to defeat a claim where the recipient was not a bona fide purchaser for value and knew or ought to have known the purpose, but only for transfers made not more than one year before the application.
Sources
- Alberta.ca – Family law changes — alberta.ca
- Family Property Act, RSA 2000, c F-4.7, s. 39 (Alberta King's Printer) — kings-printer.alberta.ca
- Alberta.ca – Dividing property between unmarried partners — alberta.ca
- Court of King's Bench Family Focused Protocol Manual (June 2026) — albertacourts.ca
Links go to official government, court and regulator pages. The law changes — confirm you are reading the current version.
This is a family law question
Ask our Team for a quote. We reply by email.