TREADSTONE LAW · ONTARIO · DIGITAL LEGAL SERVICES · EST. MMXXI ·TSL
Licensed by the Law Society of OntarioFlat fees published upfrontWe reply to messages within 1 business daySign in
№ 77 Family Law

How a BC Court Decides the Best Interests of the Child

Learn how British Columbia courts apply the best interests of the child test under the Family Law Act, including family violence and the child's views.

Family Law4 min readTSLBy the Treadstone Law Team · British ColumbiaUpdated November 6, 2026
← All articles
Key takeaways
  • In British Columbia, agreements and orders about guardianship, parenting arrangements and contact must consider the best interests of the child only.
  • The Family Law Act lists factors such as the child's health, stability, relationships, views and any family violence.
  • No particular parenting arrangement, including equal time, is presumed to be in a child's best interests.

If you are preparing for a family court matter in British Columbia, you will hear the phrase "best interests of the child" again and again. It is the test that sits underneath almost every decision about where a child lives and who makes decisions for them.

This article explains in plain words what the Family Law Act says the court looks at, how family violence is treated, and how a child's views fit in. It is general information, not advice on your own case.

This article covers the law of British Columbia.

The test looks at the child, not the parents

When parties make an agreement or a court makes an order about guardianship, parenting arrangements or contact, they must consider the best interests of the child only. The court is not trying to reward or punish a parent.

The Act also says an agreement or order is not in a child's best interests unless it protects, to the greatest extent possible, the child's physical, psychological and emotional safety, security and well-being. Government guidance describes the test the same way, as a question of what best protects a child's safety.

There is no starting assumption of equal time. The Act says no particular parenting arrangement is presumed to be in the child's best interests, and it does not presume equal parenting time, equal parental responsibilities, or joint or separate decision-making.

The factors the court weighs

The Act lists factors the court considers. They include the following:

A court may consider a person's conduct only if it substantially affects one of these factors, and only to the extent of that effect. Bad behaviour that has no effect on the child is not the focus.

How family violence is assessed

Family violence is defined broadly. It includes physical abuse, sexual abuse, attempts at either, and psychological or emotional abuse such as intimidation, harassment, coercion, threats, stalking, unreasonable restrictions on financial or personal autonomy and intentional property damage. A child's direct or indirect exposure to family violence also counts.

When the court assesses family violence, it must consider matters such as:

The child's needs and views

The Act sets no age at which a child gets to choose. The child's views are one factor, considered unless inappropriate, and weighed with the others.

A court has tools to learn about the child. It may appoint a person such as a family justice counsellor, social worker or other court-approved person to assess the child's needs, the child's views, or a party's ability and willingness to meet the child's needs. The report goes to the court and, unless the court orders otherwise, each party, and fees may be allocated to a party. A views of the child report conveys the child's views without recommendations, and is different from that assessment.

If conflict between the parties significantly impairs their capacity to act in the child's best interests, the court may appoint a lawyer for the child where it is necessary to protect those interests. The court can also admit reliable hearsay evidence from an absent child or give other directions about how the child's evidence is received.

Preparing for court

Frequently asked questions

Does BC law presume 50/50 parenting time?

No. The Act says no particular parenting arrangement is presumed to be in the child's best interests, and it does not presume equal parenting time or equal decision-making. Each case turns on the child's best interests.

At what age can a child choose which parent to live with?

The Act sets no such age. The child's views are one factor, considered unless inappropriate, and weighed with the other factors.

Can the court consider how a parent behaved during the relationship?

Only if the conduct substantially affects one of the listed factors, and only to the extent of that effect. Conduct that does not affect the child is generally not the focus.

What if there has been family violence?

Family violence is one of the factors, and the court must consider its seriousness, how recent and frequent it was, and its effect on the child. Speak with a lawyer, and with support services if you are not safe.

Sources

Links go to official government, court and regulator pages. The law changes — confirm you are reading the current version.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. British Columbia laws, tax rates, and government programs change, and how the law applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a lawyer who practises in British Columbia. Reach us at 1-844-900-1070 or send our Team a message.

This is a family law question

An uncontested divorce with us is from $2,126.88, tax included. Third-party fees are extra.

ContactStart a File →