TREADSTONE LAW · ONTARIO · DIGITAL LEGAL SERVICES · EST. MMXXI ·TSL
Home/Articles/Corporate
№ iii Corporate

Allocating the Purchase Price in an Ontario Business Sale: Why It Matters for Tax

How purchase price allocation works in an Ontario asset purchase — why buyers and sellers have conflicting tax interests, and why you must work with an accountant on this.

Corporate5 min readTSLBy the Treadstone Law team · OntarioUpdated 2026-06
All articles
Key takeaways
  • The total price in an asset purchase gets divided across categories — inventory, equipment, customer lists, non-competition covenants, goodwill, and so on.
  • Canadian tax law (under the Income Tax Act) includes provisions that allow the CRA to reallocate the purchase price if the stated allocation is not reasonable.
  • Tax treatment changes over time and varies by facts — verify current rules with your accountant.

In a business purchase structured as an asset deal, the total price paid by the buyer must be allocated across the specific assets being acquired. This is called purchase price allocation (PPA) — and it is one of the most consequential yet frequently underestimated elements of any asset transaction. The allocation affects how much tax the seller pays and what deductions the buyer can claim going forward. Because buyer and seller generally have opposite interests on allocation, it is a point of real negotiation — and it is an area where your accountant must be involved before you sign anything.

This article explains the general concepts. It does not constitute tax advice. Every transaction is different, and the tax consequences depend on individual circumstances.

Why Allocation Matters: Buyers and Sellers Want Different Things

The total price in an asset purchase gets divided across categories — inventory, equipment, customer lists, non-competition covenants, goodwill, and so on. Each category is taxed differently and offers different deduction profiles. That creates a natural tension:

Buyers generally want to allocate more value to:

Buyers want to allocate less to goodwill, because goodwill is a "eligible capital property" type asset with its own inclusion rate regime under Canadian tax law (verify the current rules with your accountant, as these rules have evolved).

Sellers generally want to allocate value to categories that:

Sellers generally want to minimize allocation to:

What Happens If the Parties Cannot Agree on Allocation?

Canadian tax law (under the Income Tax Act) includes provisions that allow the CRA to reallocate the purchase price if the stated allocation is not reasonable. While the parties are generally free to negotiate their own allocation, any allocation that appears designed purely to minimize taxes — without any grounding in the actual fair market values of the individual assets — is vulnerable to challenge.

Some purchase agreements include an allocation schedule that both parties agree to and are bound to use when filing their respective tax returns. Where the parties cannot agree on an allocation, their tax positions may diverge, potentially attracting CRA scrutiny.

Common Asset Categories and Their General Tax Character

The following is a simplified overview. Tax treatment changes over time and varies by facts — verify current rules with your accountant.

Inventory

Proceeds are generally included in the seller's income as business income. Fully deductible to the buyer as cost of goods sold.

Equipment and depreciable property (Class assets under CCA)

Seller may face recapture of previously claimed CCA if the proceeds exceed the undepreciated capital cost of the asset class. If proceeds exceed the original cost, a capital gain arises on the excess. The buyer gets a new "cost" for CCA purposes based on what they paid for that asset.

Customer lists, licences, and other intangible eligible capital property

This category has historically received treatment similar to goodwill. Canadian tax rules in this area have changed in recent years — confirm current treatment with your accountant.

Goodwill

Goodwill is the residual value of the business beyond its identifiable assets — the brand, the customer relationships, the reputation. Its tax treatment for both buyer and seller has been subject to legislative changes. Do not assume the rules you have heard about from older deals still apply without verification.

Non-competition covenants

The CRA and Canadian tax law have specific rules about whether amounts paid for a non-competition covenant are on capital or income account for the seller, and whether they are deductible for the buyer. These rules are nuanced and have been the subject of specific guidance. Verify the current treatment with a tax accountant or tax lawyer before agreeing to how the non-compete consideration will be characterized in the agreement.

The Allocation Schedule in the Purchase Agreement

In most Ontario asset purchases, the purchase agreement includes an exhibit or schedule that sets out the agreed purchase price allocation. Both parties sign off on this allocation and are expected to file their tax returns consistently with it.

Negotiating this schedule is a legitimate and important step. The parties' accountants typically take the lead. The lawyers document the agreed allocation in the purchase agreement, making it binding between the parties (though not binding on the CRA).

If you cannot reach agreement, some purchase agreements leave allocation to be determined separately, or contain a mechanism for neutral resolution. Leaving allocation open is not ideal — it creates uncertainty and potential conflict at tax filing time.

Frequently asked questions

Can we put any allocation we want in the purchase agreement?

You can agree on an allocation, but it must be grounded in the actual fair market values of the assets. An allocation that bears no relationship to reality is vulnerable to CRA challenge, and the resulting tax assessment may include penalties and interest.

Do I need to hire an accountant just for the allocation?

Yes. Purchase price allocation requires analysis of each asset's fair market value and the tax consequences to each party. This is squarely professional accounting work. A business lawyer can document the agreed allocation, but the strategic advice on what allocation to seek belongs to your accountant.

What if the buyer and I completely disagree on allocation?

It is negotiated, like price and other deal terms. Each side models their preferred allocation with their accountant. The gap is often bridged through price adjustments — if the seller wants a higher goodwill allocation (more favourable for them) and the buyer resists, the seller may accept a lower overall price to compensate.

Is allocation relevant in a share purchase?

Allocation of purchase price across individual assets is primarily relevant in an asset purchase. In a share purchase, the buyer is paying for shares — not individual assets — and the allocation question is different (it relates to the adjusted cost base of the shares). Your accountant can explain what applies in your specific deal structure.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Ontario laws, tax rates, and government programs change, and how the law applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a licensed Ontario lawyer. Treadstone Law is licensed by the Law Society of Ontario — reach us at 1-844-900-1070 or start a file online.

This is a corporate question

Start a file online — flat, published fees, reviewed by a licensed Ontario lawyer before a dollar is owed.

ContactStart a File →